spitfires
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Mustang...Spitfire???

To: "Scott Hall" <sch8489@garnet.acns.fsu.edu>
Subject: Re: Mustang...Spitfire???
From: "Laura G." <savercool@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 21:18:59 -0800
Well, at least I got 1 out of 3! <g>

I guess you're right about the MR2-I knid of thought about one but prefer to
go topless.

Laura G. and Nigel
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Hall <sch8489@garnet.acns.fsu.edu>
To: Laura G. <savercool@msn.com>
Cc: Andrew Lindeman <faustus@inconnect.com>; Andrew Mace
<amace@unix2.nysed.gov>; Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>; Spitfire List
<spitfires@autox.team.net>; Triumph List <triumphs@autox.team.net>
Date: Monday, March 15, 1999 8:03 PM
Subject: Re: Mustang...Spitfire???


>oh, laura...
>
>the mr-2 in all forms is an _excellent_ sports car by any definition.
>mid-engine, rear wheel drive, _no_ back seat and very little trunk.  can't
>get much more sporty and impractical than that.  my brother's is
>wonderful.  I still regret not buying it before him, 'cause they're
>scarce 'round here.   with the turbo in there it handles like a go kart on
>steroids.  it won't hold all that stereo equipment he loves so much and
>he's making noise about wanting a truck--I wonder how I'm going to afford
>it, and keep my skin when the s/o finds out...
>
>the 300z is maybe less sporty, but still a lot of fun, sporting car.  I've
>never driven a supra, but with all that weight, even with the mondo power,
>you may be right.
>
>scott
>
>
>




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>