spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: RANT!- NO LBC

To: Spridget List <spridgets@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: RANT!- NO LBC
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 16:13:09 -0400
References: <159.39ea6c67.2e282d8e@aol.com> <006201c46aa4$7baf8de0$0ef3bec0@NilesAD.von.gov>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
Am I mistaken, or is this the list that objected to a similar back and 
forth on the US invasion of Iraq?
-- 

jay fishbein
wallingford, ct
http://home.ix.netcom.com/~type79/ <http://home.ix.netcom.com/%7Etype79/>



David Lieb wrote:

>>Just to make sure I wasn't talking out my arse I did a quick check.  I
>>    
>>
>typed
>  
>
>>the words "labrador retriever attack child" into google, then "german
>>    
>>
>shepard
>  
>
>>attack child" then "pit bull attack child".  Here are the results:
>>Lab - 4,260 hits
>>Shepard - 7,270 hits
>>Pit Bull - 55,100 hits.
>>    
>>
>
>
>If you spell "shepherd" correctly, you get 85,600 hits, but many of them
>have no reference to dogs.
>If you drop the "retriever" from the lab search you get 16,600 and if you
>shorten it to "lab" you get 200,000.
>
>My point is that this form of googling does not constitute valid research.
>David Lieb
>former german shepherd owner,
>former australian shepherd owner,
>former lab owner,
>current terrior owner,
>to say nothing of the cats and the birds.






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>