tigers
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Shifter ergonomics

To: <stubrennan@comcast.net>, "Tiger Group" <tigers@autox.team.net>
Subject: RE: Shifter ergonomics
From: "Scott Hutchinson" <shutchin@netjets.com>
Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 12:06:36 -0400
I seem to recall reading that the change to the longer/"cranked" shifter
was done in response to complaints from the in house vehicle testing
personnel.

Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-tigers@autox.team.net [mailto:owner-tigers@autox.team.net]
On Behalf Of stubrennan@comcast.net
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 11:21 AM
To: Tiger Group
Subject: Shifter ergonomics

Before you all jump on the short shifter bandwagon, consider this:

I drove a "short shifter" Tiger a few years back, and it quickly became
apparent why they changed to the long shifter.  For me anyway, the short
one was just too far down for comfortable operation.  I have the seat
most of the way forward, and even with that, I had to lean a bit to
reach the whole pattern.

So try shifting by grabbing the standard shifter about half way down a
few times, and see how that feels.  The short one may look cool, but is
uncomfortable operation worth it?

Stu





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>