Gee, I liked my Mustang II. Of course it was a bit modified under Ohio's then
total lack of any emissions testing during that period. Mine had a hipo 289,
four speed, zero emission controls, etc. It did have that BIG "Cobra" decal
on the side that wasn'too sharp looking, but it did provide some amusement
when a guy came up to me and asked if it was a real Cobra. That was funny. I
told him yes.
Jere
-----Original Message-----
From: tigers-bounces+jteepen=usatoday.com@autox.team.net
[mailto:tigers-bounces+jteepen=usatoday.com@autox.team.net] On Behalf Of
William Lau
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 4:11 PM
To: tigers@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: [Tigers] Tigers and lack of discussion
Moon,
This is bigger than most people want to think about or admit. I was in
Australia right after they had their guns taken away. Talk about some upset
people. I never met a single person that thought it was good idea and they
wondered who were the ones that pushed it to happen except the politicians but
happen it did. This same kind of thing happened in the 80's when the
manufacturers were coerced to make weak automobiles. Who wanted it besides the
politicians but we got it. Does anyone think they made Mustang II cars because
they thought they would sell better than the regular one. - Bill --
>From a statistical point of view do you think your view has any force
>behind
it? Not. The point is that all legislation regarding our hobby is critical.
No where have I indicated that other issues don't matter. Some advocate we
only talk about the history, mechanics and values of Tigers. It's not
difficult to visualize all of our Tigers being crushed, kinda what Australia
did with legally owned firearms.
Moonstone
You are subscribed as jteepen@usatoday.com
Tigers@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/tigers
http://www.team.net/archive
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
Tigers@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/tigers
http://www.team.net/archive
|