triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: TR4A Flywheel - description needed

To: "triumph list" <triumphs@Autox.Team.Net>, "Bill Kelly" <kelly@dss.com>
Subject: Re: TR4A Flywheel - description needed
From: "DON BOYD, JOAN IKOMA" <dbji@whidbey.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 23:34:29 -0700
bill; the clutch pedal pressure you feel to hold the clutch pedal down is
30 to 40% less than with coils of same clamping power

----------
> From: Bill Kelly <kelly@dss.com>
> To: triumphs@autox.team.net
> Subject: Re: TR4A Flywheel - description needed
> Date: Friday, July 17, 1998 9:53 PM
> 
> 
> Jack -
> 
> Why would you WANT to "upgrade" to a diaphragm clutch (yes, listers, I
> am being deliberately contentious!) I always thought the industry-wide
> switch from coil-sprung to diaphragm-sprung clutches was just a cost
> reduction - equally functional, and cheaper to manufacture, because
> there are a lot fewer parts to put together.
> 
> I've also has a diaphragm clutch fail on my '89 Grand Prix, in a way
> that's just not possible with the earlier design - some bend-over tab
> that held the whole assembly together broke, and I suddenly couldn't
> shift:[  Still had 30,000 miles left in the lining, too.
> 
> Does anybody know of any advantage in a diaphragm clutch?
> 
> Bill Kelly
> '62 Herald (coil clutch)
> '68 TR250 (diaphragm)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>