triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: vacuum advance/retard differences?

To: Randall Young <ryoung@NAVCOMTECH.COM>
Subject: RE: vacuum advance/retard differences?
From: David Massey <105671.471@compuserve.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 15:47:59 -0400
Cc: Triumphs <triumphs@autox.team.net>
Message text written by Randall Young
>As I see it, the desired result of an idling engine is to keep the engine
running.  The less fuel burned to accomplish that end, the higher the
efficiency.

Much like my refrigerator (where I don't plan to ever recover that
potential
energy and do anything with it), the desired result does not have to
include
work done in the classical physics sense.  The term 'efficiency' is
commonly
extended to cover all cases where resources are consumed to produce a
result.
<

Actually, you aren't talking about efficiency, you are talking about
efficacy - the power to produced the desired effect.  Efficiency is energy
out divided by energy in.

Dave

///  triumphs@autox.team.net mailing list
///  To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net
///  with nothing in it but
///
///     unsubscribe triumphs
///
///  or try  http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>