triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

[Fot] Failed Parts Alert

Subject: [Fot] Failed Parts Alert
From: info at dieselperformanceparts.com (DPPI - Mark Craig)
Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 12:17:45 +0000
References: <F9267273-20DD-4B36-B8E5-854FD9236740@me.com> <931625317.703081.1526333762030@connect.xfinity.com>
Ron,

Can you send a picture of what you did??

[http://dieselperformanceparts.com/media/mail/logo_small_dppi.png]<dieselperformanceparts.com>



Mark Craig
Diesel Performance Parts, Inc.
411 Allied Drive, Nashville, TN 37211
www.dieselperformanceparts.com<http://www.dieselperformanceparts.com/>

[http://dieselperformanceparts.com/media/mail/icon_social_facebook.jpg]<https://www.facebook.com/DieselPerformanceParts>
 [http://dieselperformanceparts.com/media/mail/icon_social_twitter.jpg] 
<https://twitter.com/PerfectDiesel>  
[http://dieselperformanceparts.com/media/mail/icon_social_googleplus.jpg] 
<https://plus.google.com/u/0/104451046659790804057/posts>  
[http://dieselperformanceparts.com/media/mail/icon_social_linkedin.jpg] 
<http://www.linkedin.com/company/diesel-performance-parts-inc->




Phone: 615-834-0066
Fax: 615-834-9923




From: Fot [mailto:fot-bounces at autox.team.net] On Behalf Of Ron KRANTZ via Fot
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2018 4:36 PM
To: Scott Janzen <sjanzen at me.com>; FOT <FOT at autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: [Fot] Failed Parts Alert


This is my fix.  I broke the verticle link shown in 1982 at Mid-O.  The thread 
on the OE part is 10 threads per inch and so I turned the piece shown so it fit 
all the way to the top of the machined link and then turned the bottom of the 
treads off to fit a heim joint.  I threaded the OE lube hole all the way to the 
top and use a long bolt (forget the actual size and length).  So the result is 
similar to the Canley piece except I made mine in 1982.  The original pieces I 
made are still on the car today.  But I did make a spare set that are still on 
the shelf.

I?ve been using the trunnionless front suspension vertical link on my GT6 that 
Canley Classics sells for the past two years.  I?ve now had two fail the annual 
magnaflux tests.  They cracked in different locations, one right at the 
machining line for the flat for the stub axle nut, on the back side where the 
steering arm passes through, and one on the upright at what appeared to be a 
casting mark, near the bump you see in the photo below.  Neither crack was 
visible to the eye. The upright Canley sells no longer looks exactly like the 
photo - it now has a machined area on the back side, away from the wheel, much 
like stock ones.  Maybe I just had bad luck, but between two cracks and some 
binding issues at the ball joint I had to rectify, I would no longer recommend 
these.

I started using the Canley units when the stock ones developed cracks in the 
traditional place at the top end of the threads where the trunnion is.

I have now installed uprights I got from Jigsaw Racing 
https://jigsawracingservices.com - Mark Field, in England.  The main difference 
from stock is they are not drilled for a grease fitting or grease boring down 
into the trunnion, which should make them stronger where the stock ones usually 
fail.  Mark races Spitfires and GT6s for himself and for customers in vintage 
racing and claims he has never had a failure.  He further claims that the units 
are made in the original forging molds and by the same people that made the 
Stanpart units.

Main point is, even though it?s a pain, pull your critical parts off and get 
them magnafluxed at least once in a while.  I?ve become paranoid and this is 
now an annual exercise.  The machine shop I go to usually does it for free 
while I am watching, probably because I?m usually dropping off engine parts 
where the real dollars get spent!

[cid:image006.png at 01D3EC1C.D11E2710]


_______________________________________________

http://www.fot-racing.com

Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/fot

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://autox.team.net/pipermail/fot/attachments/20180515/14b15e01/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 13119 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: 
<http://autox.team.net/pipermail/fot/attachments/20180515/14b15e01/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2153 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
URL: 
<http://autox.team.net/pipermail/fot/attachments/20180515/14b15e01/attachment.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2472 bytes
Desc: image003.jpg
URL: 
<http://autox.team.net/pipermail/fot/attachments/20180515/14b15e01/attachment-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3083 bytes
Desc: image004.jpg
URL: 
<http://autox.team.net/pipermail/fot/attachments/20180515/14b15e01/attachment-0002.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image005.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2784 bytes
Desc: image005.jpg
URL: 
<http://autox.team.net/pipermail/fot/attachments/20180515/14b15e01/attachment-0003.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image006.png
Type: image/png
Size: 138102 bytes
Desc: image006.png
URL: 
<http://autox.team.net/pipermail/fot/attachments/20180515/14b15e01/attachment-0001.png>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>