vintage-race
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Bugeye Sprites w/ 1275cc at SVRA

To: "Wm. Severin Thompson" <wsthompson@thicko.com>,
Subject: Re: Bugeye Sprites w/ 1275cc at SVRA
From: "Gerald Brazil" <gerrybraz@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 1997 19:23:01 -0500
One other thing, Rick has used Comptune engines, but probably the best and
most reliable one he has every had was one he put together himself following
Vizard's book.

GJB
-----Original Message-----
From: Wm. Severin Thompson <wsthompson@thicko.com>
To: Brian Evans <brian@uunet.ca>
Cc: Wrtr@aol.com <Wrtr@aol.com>; vintage-race@Autox.Team.Net
<vintage-race@Autox.Team.Net>
Date: Wednesday, November 26, 1997 2:51 PM
Subject: Re: Bugeye Sprites w/ 1275cc at SVRA


>Rick Cooks car is nowhere near the steroid beast that Dr. J's is. Dr. J
>has a certified 149 HP at the flywheel. Yowsa! If they were running
>similar times, I suspect one's a significantly better driver.....
>
>
>WST
>
>
>Brian Evans wrote:
>
>> Throwing gasoline firmly on the fire, a fast sprite (1275) wasn't
>> doing
>> 1:23's at Waterford.  A fast sprite with 948 does 1:23's (Bob Mason,
>> last
>> time he was there a few years ago).  A fast sprite (1275) does 1:18's
>> at
>> waterford - both Dr. Jahamiak and Rick Cook were in the 18's this
>> year.
>> Which is a competitive time for a full tilt GT-5 Mini, also.
>>
>> I did 1:29's I think, this year, in my 948 Midget with the infamous L
>> section tires.
>>
>> Brian
>>
>> >
>> >Funny thing is, at Waterford this year, John Deikis was running
>> 1:31's, which
>> >was the lap record for a 1098 Sprite in about 1965, I was running
>> 1:26 in my
>> >MGB, which wasn't but a second or two off the lap record for an MGB
>> in 1966
>> >and my TD ran 1:42, which is about what a 948 Bugeye ran there in
>> 1960. On
>> >the other hand, the fast TCs and TDs last year were in the 29s a good
>> vintage
>> >MGB is around 20 flat and a fast Sprite(1275cc) vintage car is about
>> 23s.
>> >What is it exactly that we are doing here?
>> >
>> >Kevin
>> >
>> >PS: Those pace laps do seem kind of quick sometimes....
>> >
>
>
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>