fot
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: 4.3 ltr. Triumph

To: "Joe Curry" <spitlist@gte.net>, "Jack W. Drews" <vinttr4@geneseo.net>
Subject: RE: 4.3 ltr. Triumph
From: "James F. Libecco" <jfl@neoucom.edu>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 21:26:05 -0400
by the weight of my jeep, the majority of which coming from the massive
engine- putting out much less power than something that size ought to-a poor
tr would be scraping through frame rails if 1000# springs weren't fitted...

jim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-fot@autox.team.net [mailto:owner-fot@autox.team.net]On
> Behalf Of Joe Curry
> Sent: Friday, August 25, 2000 8:50 PM
> To: Jack W. Drews
> Cc: R. John Lye; T.R. Householder; triumphs@autox.team.net;
> fot@autox.team.net
> Subject: Re: 4.3 ltr. Triumph
>
>
>
>
> "Jack W. Drews" wrote:
> >
> > The popular conversion for more horsepower seems to be V6's or
> V8's. I wonder
> > if anybody has tried a newer straight six - there are several
> around that
> > have lots more hp than the Triumph, and it would seem that the steering
> > column and other pieces wouldn't be disturbed so much.
>
>
> The 4 Liter straight 6 in my wife's Jeep puts out lots of power,
> but It sure is Looooooong!  I wonder if it would fit!
>
> Joe (C)


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>