on 9/11/00 5:14 PM, Parks, David at David.Parks@lfr.com wrote:
> Why do we have those vintage classes? Let's get rid of them. If the
> flatheads and straight motors can't compete with the V8's, thats too bad.
> Why should they have their own class? And why treat roadsters special? It's
> a car isn't it? Lump 'em all together. And why have all the body classes
> anyway? The wheels are either inside the body or they're not. And the engine
> class breaks were obviously thought of by some crybaby that didn't want to
> run the biggest motor he could. If you are going to race, go for it. Build
> that big motor. Why, if we do this right, maybe we can cut it back to just
> two classes, Unlimited Streamliner and Unlimited Lakester. But then, why
> split hairs when maybe there should just be one class. Are you the fastest
> of everything or not. That's all that matters, right?
>
And put an age limit on the drivers as well ... no one older than the body
of the car.
Wes
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nt788@aol.com [mailto:Nt788@aol.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 4:20 PM
> To: ARDUNDOUG@aol.com; land-speed@autox.team.net
> Subject: Re: New Category
>
>
> If you and the kids are going to race, build something to win, instead of
> trying to change the rules! Its a much more rewarding effort. Are those in
> favor the same people who like handicapping? Jack
>
|