Jon; That might be it. NT3 has a C4 and angle drive, 2 is a bike type drive.
Rich Fox
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jonathan Amo" <webmaster@landracing.com>
To: "Richard Fox" <v4gr@rcn.com>
Cc: >; "list" <land-speed@autox.team.net>
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 04:15 PM
Subject: NT2 -vs- NT3
> Rich or Jack,
>
> Could it be the way the power is transmitted to the wheels in needing
> more horsepower? Interesting thought? Doesnt NT2 use chain drive while
> NT3 uses a driveshaft? If that is the case, more hp loss in drivetrain,
> that is why NT3 would need more horsepower?
>
> Jonathan
>
>
> Richard Fox wrote:
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "gary baker" <lsr350@hotmail.com>
> > To: <"list" <land-speed@autox.team.net>
> > Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2002 11:40 PM
> > Subject: Re: March CW
> >
> >
> >
> >>how? Nebulous II- 150hp - 250mph bloody good aerodynamics
> >>I guess Jack knows something about the areo of NT2. After all he
designed
> >>
> > and built it. NT3 looks slicker than 2 but needs more HP to go 250. How
> > come? Rich Fox
/// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try
/// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
/// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/land-speed
|