Richard, you forgot #5: Jack ain't saying!
Paul.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Fox" <v4gr@rcn.com>
To: <Nt788@aol.com>; <webmaster@landracing.com>
Cc: <land-speed@autox.team.net>
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 7:05 PM
Subject: Re: NT2 -vs- NT3
> #4 is a good point. Maybe jack is sandbagging a little here?. 150HP sounds
a
> little low for a 250mph car. Numbers may be a little higher here. How
'bout
> it Jack? R. Fox
>
>
> > In a message dated 2/11/2002 4:14:29 PM Pacific Standard Time,
> > webmaster@landracing.com writes:
> >
> > << Why NT3 would need more horsepower? >>
> > Jack Responds--- # 1 Neb III is heavier? # 2 Neb.II might use or average
> more
> > HP per run?#3 Neb. II engine gearbox combo 40yrs. more efficient? #4
Maybe
> > Neb. III really doesn't really have more HP! Nebulous Theorem
/// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try
/// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
/// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/land-speed
|