Re: NT2 -vs- NT3

["Richard Fox" <v4gr@rcn.com>]

#4 is a good point. Maybe jack is sandbagging a little here?. 150HP sounds a
little low for a 250mph car.  Numbers may be a little higher here. How 'bout
it Jack?   R. Fox


> In a message dated 2/11/2002 4:14:29 PM Pacific Standard Time,
> webmaster@landracing.com writes:
>
> << Why NT3 would need more horsepower? >>
> Jack Responds--- # 1 Neb III is heavier? # 2 Neb.II might use or average
more
> HP per run?#3 Neb. II engine gearbox combo 40yrs. more efficient? #4 Maybe
> Neb. III really doesn't really have more HP! Nebulous Theorem

///  unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net  or try
///  http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/land-speed