Re: NT2 -vs- NT3

[Jonathan Amo <webmaster@landracing.com>]

Bull puckey if I ever heard of it. Why is it then its counter part the 
Explorer and escape with same tires have a 112-115 mph speed rating. Or 
even its rival the S10 pickups? Tires arent the issue. Then 01 ranger 
has the lowest governed speed rating of EVERY car on the market.
Try again?

Jonathan

Ed Van Scoy wrote:

> 
> Yes   It is a liability issue.  The tires are not rated for higher speee.
> ed
> 
> Jonathan Amo wrote:
> 
>> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 22:15:34 -0700
>> From: Jonathan Amo <webmaster@landracing.com>
>> To: Nt788@aol.com
>> Subject: Re: NT2 -vs- NT3
>>
>> Well Jack damn you do have all the answers, can you tell me why my 2001
>> Ford Ranger V6 4.0L has a speed limiter at 91 mph?
>>
>> Jonathan (who cant get to bonneville any faster than 91 mph) Amo
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Nt788@aol.com wrote:
>>
>>> In a message dated 2/11/2002 4:14:29 PM Pacific Standard Time,
>>> webmaster@landracing.com writes:
>>>
>>> << Why NT3 would need more horsepower? >>
>>> Jack Responds--- # 1 Neb III is heavier? # 2 Neb.II might use or 
>>> average more
>>> HP per run?#3 Neb. II engine gearbox combo 40yrs. more efficient? #4 
>>> Maybe
>>> Neb. III really doesn't really have more HP! Nebulous Theorem

///  unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net  or try
///  http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/land-speed