land-speed
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Rulebook Firewall Question

To: "Albaugh, Neil" <albaugh_neil@ti.com>
Subject: Re: Rulebook Firewall Question
From: Joe Timney <joetimney@dol.net>
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2002 16:27:41 -0500
Neil,

There would not be any easy way to identify the material a firewall was made of.
as the only tools an inspector has are dial calipers and a tape measure. The 
rule
book does states the any exceptions are to be outlined in a letter, including 
any
calculations, submited to the racing organization before the meet.

joe

"Albaugh, Neil" wrote:

> List;
>
> I received my new 2002 SCTA Rulebook in the mail yesterday and started
> reading it to make sure I build my car in compliance with the regulations.
> The "firewall" requirement seems to be somewhat vague in that it requires a
> minimum 0.090" metal firewall between the driver & engine. The vagueness is
> in the word "metal"-- it is not specific about what firewall material is
> acceptable. This even implies that a 0.090" 5052-0 aluminum firewall would
> be acceptable.
>
> Last year I bought some thinner Inconel sheets with the idea of riveting
> them to the chassis tubes (with Monel rivets) and using Inconel as my
> firewall. It looks as if this won't be legal even though Inconel is a high-
> temperature stainless steel that is used to fabricate jet engines. Aluminum,
> on the other hand, looks to be a perfectly legal firewall material even
> though it melts at less than 1000 degrees. That doesn't seem to be
> consistent with safety-- I'd rather be behind (actually, 'ahead of' in my
> case-- a mid- engine setup) an Inconel firewall than one made of most other
> "metals."
>
> Is there any flexibility in this rule interpretation?
>
> Regards, Neil     Tucson, AZ  (end of whining & sniveling)

///  unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net  or try
///  http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/land-speed


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>