Jack:
don't assume I could never do it, just because I'm not very interested.
As a Mechanical Engineering Consultant, I work on 100megawatt turbines just
about every month, and I've done research projects on both turbines and pure
jets (including the first EPA emissions tests on a jet engine-- summer,
1971).
I know the thermodynamics, and most of the (basic) metallurgy for all the
common turbine cycles. It would be easier for me to operate and maintain
such a powerplant for lsr than it is to do my dual-OHC bike engine. (More
expensive, however.)
As a young teen, I built very successful model rockets, and even won a
science fair with my own rocket engine design back in Junior High. I built
my first thrust-measurment engine dyno at age 14.
But to me the thrust motors seem not very exciting anymore, compared to
recips and rotaries (or even "shaft" turbines). I'm thinking maybe a lot of
hot-rodders were more excited about the thrust vehicles when they were
"new"-- back in the '60s-- than they are now. Or is it just me?
What-- did I piss you off with the remark about "forced social program"--??
Russ, #1226B
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-land-speed@autox.team.net
[mailto:owner-land-speed@autox.team.net]On Behalf Of Nt788@aol.com
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 11:16 AM
To: rtmack@concentric.net; jdincau@qnet.com; land-speed@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: Thrust
In a message dated 10/9/2003 8:25:33 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
rtmack@concentric.net writes:
<< Jim put it a little bluntly-- but there really doesn't appear to be much
interest in thrust cars in America anymore. Maybe it's a fad that just
passed? >>
Don't make fun of something you could never do! jack
|