mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: starting newsgroup

To: "EPMD- Van syckel, John" <vansyck@hq.1perscom.heidelberg.army.mil>,
Subject: Re: starting newsgroup
From: "Russell T. Neyhart" <vwruss@gte.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 1998 07:04:33 -0500
Starting an MG newsgroup would not limit the number of messages, nor the
content, but would download to your machine faster.  You'd still have all
the same good stuff, just a bit faster and more organized. :-)
-----Original Message-----
From: EPMD- Van syckel, John <vansyck@hq.1perscom.heidelberg.army.mil>
To: Bob Newell <rnewell@pop.netaddress.usa.net>
Cc: MG List <mgs@autox.team.net>
Date: Sunday, March 15, 1998 6:33 AM
Subject: RE: starting newsgroup


>I like it the way it is.  I enjoy the LBC postings, and I enjoy the "off
the
>wall" stuff.  I enjoy the good advice and I enjoy the humor.   I also like
>learning about things that I haven't had to do yet, but may have to do in
>the future.   I can always delete what I don't want to read.
>
>Just my opinion.
>
>"Jay"
>John S. van Syckel
>1971 MGB
>
>> ----------
>> From: Bob Newell[SMTP:rnewell@pop.netaddress.usa.net]
>> Sent: Sonntag, 15. März 1998 01:53
>> To: mgs@autox.team.net
>> Subject: starting newsgroup
>>
>>   Is anyone else tired of having to sit throught the downloading of
>> 60-80 messages at a time in this mailing list?  Don't get me wrong,
>> but i really like this mailing list, its just that considering the
>> volume of mail sent every day on it, maybe a news group would be a
>> more appropriate format for this discussion.  With a news group you
>> have better organization, you don't have to download whole messages,
>> and your mailbox does not get filled to overflowing.  I think that an
>> MG newsgroup would be beneficial to all the MG fans out there who may
>> not have heard of this mailing list but certainly could find an
>> "alt.autos.mg" newsgroup.  What are everyone's thoughts on this?
>>   Does anyone know how to form a newsgroup (I have some idea, but not
>> sure how exactly)?
>>   Please write back with your response.
>>
>> Robert Newell
>>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>