mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 5 speed vs. OD conversion

To: Charles & Peggy Robinson <ccrobins@ktc.com>
Subject: Re: 5 speed vs. OD conversion
From: Andy Ramm <aramm@concentric.net>
Date: Mon, 11 May 1998 23:00:34 -0700
Having owned and still owning Bs both with and without OD, I can say with
absolute certainty that regardless of engine wear or gas mileage
considerations, the OD is one of the best piece-of-mind additions you can
make.  The simple reduction in noise and chassis buzz is worth every penny. 
The ability to cruise comfortably at 75-80 MPH doesn't hurt either.

BTW, I am loathe to ever disagree with John Twist on anything, but on the OD
issue where wear and mileage is concerned, I'm sad to say but I must.  Simple
mathematics and physics, as well as personal experience bear witness to a
contradictory opinion.  IMHO, YMMV, ODISBETTER.

Cheers,

Andy

'67 BGT
'69 B
'72 B

Charles & Peggy Robinson wrote:
> 
> Seems like everyone who is anti-overdrive is quoting John Twist.  I
> saw that blurb he wrote about overdrives on the NAMGBR web page before
> it was printed in the "Driver." I wondered what his logic was.  So after
> he announced his recovery from his illness and surgery I wrote to him
> and asked him.  In his reply he said that he'd never seen any evidence
> pro or con, it was strictly unsupported opinion.  I offered him my own
> gas mileage results (about 15% increase in mpg) and suggested that the
> SAE might have some wear data.  I haven't heard from him since.
> 
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>