I can't say that mine gets the most road time, but it has been in the car
for 10years and has been getting 10k or so miles per year for 5years of
that, since that is as long as I have been driving. I autocross on it
and drive hard everywhere I go. I have never had any problems with it,
but on the other hand I have never driven an mg with the carbon bearing to
compare it to.
James Nazarian
'71 B roadster
'74 BGT with no sills
'63 Buick 215 eyeing another rolling chassis
On Tue, 19 Oct 1999, Larry Hoy wrote:
> James, et al,
>
> I was going to suggest a roller throw out bearing might
> alleviate Tab's problem, but I have never used one, and over
> the years I have heard good and bad things about them. I
> would be interested in the input from this list on them, so
> what do you think? The biggest issue would be, are they
> durable? No sense replacing a carbon bearing with one that
> doesn't last as long.
>
> Larry Hoy
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-mgs@autox.team.net
> > [mailto:owner-mgs@autox.team.net]On
> > Behalf Of James Nazarian Jr
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 1999 2:43 AM
> > To: Larry Hoy
> > Cc: Tab Julius; mgs@autox.team.net
> > Subject: RE: Bypass clutched idle reducer?
> >
> >
> > You might try the roller throw out bearing. I am
> > personally very happy
> > with it and I know many others are too. I think
> > that it also aleviates
> > many of the problems with riding the cluch and
> > related issues. I notice
> > many drivers stop at a light and sit there in
> > gear clutch depressed until
> > light turns. I'm not saying this is your problem
> > but you can't even think
> > about doing this with the carbon bearings. As
> > far as I can tell the
> > roller bearing fixes that, and it lasts quite a
> > bit longer.
> >
> > James Nazarian
> > '71 B roadster
> > '74 BGT with no sills
> > '63 Buick 215 eyeing another rolling chassis
>
|