miq@teleport.com wrote:
> MarkNoakes@aol.com says:
> >
> > This is definitely a serious change in the approach to "clunker"
> laws and
> > definitely something we can't ignore--either from the legal side or
> from the
> > technical "how much emissions our trucks put out" side. Notice that
> this is
> > much more insidious than the TX law that someone else put on the
> list
> > recently. Even though this new approach is starting in Oregon,
> expect it to
> > spread to other states.
>
> I've been giving this some thought, and came up with an idea. Please
> allow
> me some indulgence here. While I gladly administer the list and keep
> it
> running for purely selfless reasons, I'd like to think that having a
> part
> in organized 540 members world wide interested in these oletrucks
> entitles
> me to a perk from time to time. This is one of those times.
>
> I'd like to put up a draft letter to the list--others input is
> welcome, and
> then submit it to the legislation involved with this signed by all the
>
> members of the list (well their email addresses anyway). What I would
> do
> is send the list the letter to be sent with a disclaimer on it
> reading:
>
> "Your silent acceptance of this letter forwards the list
> administrator the right to add your email to the signers as a
> class
> agreement. If you do not wish to be a party to this stance,
> send
> a message to (miq@teleport.com) and I will remove your address
> from
> the list of signers when the letter is sent to the
> legislature."
>
> Obviously, the letter drafted and the list of signers would be
> available
> for other states fight in this issue.
>
> So I'd like to hear opinions on this. Am I stepping over the line
> here?
>
> --
> __
> Miq Millman miq@teleport.com
> Tualatin, OR
> oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and
> 1959
Count me in...........let me know if there is anything else I can do to
help.
Brad Newman
Coppell, Texas
oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959
|