spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [midgetsprite] Retirement Question

To: "Jim Johnson" <bmwwxman@gmail.com>,
Subject: Re: [midgetsprite] Retirement Question
From: "Larry Daniels" <ladaniels@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 07:00:27 -0500
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jim Johnson" <bmwwxman@gmail.com>

Or at least limit the ceiling of the malpractice awards. Should we pay
someone who makes 25K a year $25M for their pain and suffering?  Bring
malpractice judgements back to something resembling reality and the
insurance rates would fall accordingly.

Damned trial lawyers!!  They've F*$ked up everything in this country.
Fujkawa was right!!
(Ooops!!  Hope there's no trial lawyers reading this!  - Of course
there aren't!!  They'd never
lower themselves to driving LBCs!!)

Cheers!!
Jim - 68 Midget in Dodge City
===================================

Trial lawyers don't set judgements.  Juries do.  If the people want to 
criticize those who set the judgement amounts, they need to look at 
themselves.

What does a person's income have to do with their pain and suffering?  Do 
wealthy people feel more pain?  Why in the world should their income have 
anything to do with that?   Compensation for loss of income and other 
economic damages certainly should consider that, but not for pain and 
suffering and other non-economic damages.

Malpractice insurance premiums account for about 2% of medical costs. 
Limiting those costs will make a difference of less than 1/2 of 1%.  Big 
deal.

No,  I am not a trial lawyer.


Larry Daniels

"And so if people are violating the law by doing drugs, they ought to be 
accused and they ought to be convicted and they ought to be sent up."

Rush Limbaugh 




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>