It was after I wrote my post that I saw the one about "the other side of the
story."
Yeah, it seems that possibly a LOT of fine points, and maybe several gross
points, were -- uh -- overlooked?
If indeed that turns out to be the case, then I must agree that the episode
will not be good for racing. The builder of AMP, up front creating a helluva
facility not only for racers but specifically looking at autocrossers as
well, built a model facility. However, from the political aspect, it may
turn out to be a model of how not to do it. I can only hope it turns out
otherwise.
--Rocky
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Hirt" <mark.hirt@comcast.net>
To: <autox@autox.team.net>
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 7:49 AM
Subject: Re: Arizona Motorsports Park
> On 1/22/2004 1:08 AM, Rocky Entriken wrote:
>
> > Like I said, the lawyers will be busy!
> >
> > Sounds like a technical argument over whether all the fine points of the
> > Special Use Permit were complied with.
>
> Fine points? Please define fine. Don't get me wrong I love racing and we
> need more places to do it BUT the history behind this place shows the
> owner clearly violated just about every "special" use permit he was ever
> granted.
>
> While many will disagree my gut feeling tells me this is very bad for
> Racing. In the future communitys may/will use this facilities actions
> against any new track proposals.
>
> --
>
> Regards,
>
> Mark Hirt
|