datsun-roadsters
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: GRM Test

To: "Gordon Glasgow" <glasgow@serv.net>,
Subject: Re: GRM Test
From: "jdg1" <jdg1@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 1999 18:32:37 -0700
Gordon,

You usually are precise in your word selection -- so -- what do you mean by
"truly representative 2000"?

Jerry

'69 2000 ( I'm wondering)

----- Original Message -----
From: Gordon Glasgow <glasgow@serv.net>
To: Datsun Roadsters <datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net>
Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 1999 10:38 PM
Subject: Re: GRM Test


> While I basically agree with Gary that it sure would have been nice to
have
> a truly representative 2000 in the comparison test, I can't criticize GRM
> very much overall. They have done two previous Vintage Views articles on
> Datsun roadsters (May 1989 and Nov/Dec 1993), which is two more than any
> other magazine has done!
>
> Gary Boone wrote:
>
> > Datsun Roadster List & Grassroots Motorsports Magazine,
> > There was a recent thread on the Datsun Roadster List regarding an
> > attempt to get more attention, respect, and value for the Datsun
> > roadsters. There was also some mention of a thought to get Grassroots
> > Motorsports Magazine (GRM) to give the Datsun roadster some attention.
> > GRM had a great comparison test of several makes of roadsters from
> > different makes and vintages, which included a '69 Datsun 2000.  It was
> > GRM's March/April 1998 issue.  The comparison test was for best...
>
> --
> Gordon Glasgow
> Renton, WA
> http://www.gordon-glasgow.org
>
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>