spitfires
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: List postings suggestion

To: "'spitfires@autox.team.net'" <spitfires@autox.team.net>
Subject: RE: List postings suggestion
From: Dean Dashwood <DDashwood@softwright.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 1999 08:49:21 +0100
I also agree with this to a large extent, but on a related note, if you
post a question to the list, it would be nice to get a follow-up e-mail
posted to the list once the problem is fixed.

You could use this e-mail to summarize the replies you got off-list, as
well as to tell the list what the problem actually turned out to be, and
how you got around it.

Dean Dashwood
-------------------------------

>----------
>From:  David Gates[SMTP:dgates@lava.net]
>Sent:  01 April 1999 06:13
>To:    spitfires@autox.team.net
>Subject:       Re: List postings suggestion
>
>
>Eric and list,
>
>I completely agree.  I have found this to be true also.  I really enjoy
>reading all the posts and responses.  
>
>I might add that it is not necessary to reply both to the list and to the
>person because then that person ends up getting double emails.  Its not
>really a big deal, just one more step involved by having to delete one of
>them.
>
>Party on,
>David Gates
>
>At 09:41 PM 3/31/99 -0500, you wrote:
>>
>>
>>Hello all,
>>
>>After having been on this e-mail list for some time, I have noticed
>>something about the posts I receive and I would like to offer a suggestion
>>to make the list more useful to everyone.
>>
>>I read many interesting questions about various problems that owners are
>>having, but I never see more than one or two replies. The reason for this,
>>I believe, is that the responses are sent privately to the person who asked
>>for the information. I have found this to be the case both when I post
>>questions and when a friend of mine recently asked for some input and got
>>several useful replies which were send directly to him only.
>>
>>The problem with this is that most readers, whose Spitfires do not
>>necessarily have the ailment mentioned but would like to read what people
>>have to say about it, completely miss out on the exchange of information.
>>
>>I would like to suggest that whenever a list member has some information
>>for a person who posted a question that they post publicly as well as send
>>the message directly to the person who asked for help. That way we can all
>>benefit from your expertise.
>>
>>I believe this is completely in line with the mission of this list, and I
>>would not mind at all receiving a few more messages a day that are
>>substantive and useful in content.
>>
>>I welcome input on this suggestion -- and for goodness sakes, post your
>>opinions to the list! :)
>>
>>Thanks for reading,
>>Eric.
>>
>>P.S. On a related note, I would also like to suggest that chatty one-liner
>>messages be sent privately and not posted publicly.
>>
>>
>>-----
>>Eric Yates
>>eyates@enteract.com
>>1978 Spitfire 1500 FM 71614 U
>>Chicago, IL USA
>>
>>
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>