spitfires
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Engine type

To: "'Richard B Gosling'" <Gosling_Richard_B@perkins.com>,
Subject: RE: Engine type
From: "Bowen, Patrick A RP2" <PABowen@sar.med.navy.mil>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 07:54:16 -0400
now I have read the history of some of the engines before but of the likes
of me cannot remember.  Everytime I talk to a machine shop or someone else
they refer to the engine as a tractor engine.  From my memory there was a
Triumph engine that started out this way but I did not believe it was the
Spitfires, could someone set me straight with this.  History lesson please.

Patrick Bowen

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard B Gosling [mailto:Gosling_Richard_B@perkins.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2000 4:53 AM
To: npenney
Cc: spitfires
Subject: Re: Engine type



Nolan,

The engine that ended up in the Spitfire started life fitted to the Standard
8,
 capacity 803cc, and was known as the SC engine (for small car).  It was
bored
 out to 1147 for Mk I and II Spitfire, then stroked to 1296 for the Mk III
and
 IV, and then 1493 for the 1500.  Exactly which versions were also used in
 other cars I'm not sure - the Herald used some variation, as did
 smaller-engined Dolomites (and Toledos?), and the 1500 was used in the MG
 Midget 1500 (which had used the Austin A-series engine up to then).

No doubt the likes of Graham Stretch and Andy Mace can tell you much more
than
 I can (which is largely taken out of a page in the Moss UK catalogue)

Richard and Daffy

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>