spitfires
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: How's this for anti-theft?

To: "Bill Gunshannon" <bill@cs.scranton.edu>
Subject: Re: How's this for anti-theft?
From: "Graham Stretch" <technical@iwnet.screaming.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 23:57:21 +0100
Hi Bill
Perhaps I should have added I think this applies to theft deterrents and
alarms, this is possibly because they can be remotely operated.

Graham.
2500 PI MKII
Sprinted Dolomite
2000 MKI
Toledo
1300 Front Wheel Drive
http://members.tripod.co.uk/TriumphIW/index.html

----- Original Message -----
From: Bill Gunshannon <bill@cs.scranton.edu>
To: Graham Stretch <technical@iwnet.screaming.net>
Cc: Jeff McNeal <jmcneal@ohms.com>; Spitfire List <spitfires@autox.team.net>
Sent: Friday, June 23, 2000 2:56 PM
Subject: Re: How's this for anti-theft?


> On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, Graham Stretch wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi Jeff
> > In some places e.g. UK it is illegal to have a switch to the ign circuit
> > that can interrupt the ignition whilst the car is in motion, don't know
why
> > just is.
>
> You mean they don't have an ignition switch??  Or isn't that precisely
> what it does if you turn it off while the car is moving??
>
> bill
>
> --
> Bill Gunshannon          |  de-moc-ra-cy (di mok' ra see) n.  Three wolves
> bill@cs.scranton.edu     |  and a sheep voting on what's for dinner.
> University of Scranton   |
> Scranton, Pennsylvania   |         #include <std.disclaimer.h>
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>