spitfires
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: early/late rear springs, was sagging rear/advice

To: M D Nugent <carcentric@yahoo.com>
Subject: RE: early/late rear springs, was sagging rear/advice
From: Barry Schwartz <v6spitfireguy@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 10:07:17 -0800
Nope, ALL springs for the Spitfires (and GT6) are the same distance eye to
eye - the longer axles require different radius rod mounting at the body
(now that they have different angles for the radius rod mounting), they are
now in a different position (angle) since that they have moved outward -
the uprights pivot at the bolt, so the same fixed spring can be used, but
the angle of the uprights will be more and yes, more pronounced negative
camber will result, unless a stronger rated spring is used to compensate
for the added leverage of the longer axles

***********************************************
> Isn't the swing spring longer (eye to eye) than the fixed-center
>spring?  It seems as though it would have to be to keep the rear
>suspension angles the same given the longer axles used with the swing
>spring .

Barry Schwartz
La Mesa, CA (San Diego)


-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.428 / Virus Database: 268.13.20/508 - Release Date: 10/31/2006 
11:30 AM


===  This list supported in part by The Vintage Triumph Register
===     http://www.vtr.org



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>