I have to agree with Paul. All of my dealing's with APT tell me that they
are a 1st class operation. David Anton is more than willing to discuss a
problem and offer insights as to the solution.
Larry Miller (Real Larry)
----- Original Message -----
From "Paul A Asgeirsson" <pasgeirsson at juno.com>
To: <maine2me@yahoo.com>
Cc: <suhs2@hotmail.com>; <Bkitterer@aol.com>; <spridgets@autox.team.net>
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2000 9:48 AM
Subject: Re: Crank Counterweights
> Moss instead of APT?
>
> Saving a few bucks this way may not be saving any money. Dealing with
> APT is a pleasure. All the technical answers at the other end of a phone
> call. To me, that is really worth a few bucks. FWIW
>
> Paul
> PAsgeirsson@juno.com
>
> On Thu, 24 Feb 2000 09:27:31 -0800 (PST) Dan Dwelley <maine2me@yahoo.com>
> writes:
> >I took a look at that web site...I think their prices
> >are a little off! I think the Moss equiv. is a few
> >bucks cheaper for the exact same parts.
> >
> >Dan Dwelley
> >77 Midget
> >Alexandria, Va.
> >
> >--- shawn tobin <suhs2@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> Is that what Vizard calls "wedging" the crank? I've
> >> seen this in "the book"
> >> and you might find a picture on
> >> http://www.aptfast.com
> >>
> >> APT does this for a nominal fee (please define
> >> nominal since nominal is
> >> relative)
> >>
> >>
> >Do You Yahoo!?
>
>
|