| To: | <b-evans@earthlink.net>, "Spridgets" <spridgets@autox.team.net> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: CA- no insurance... |
| Date: | Fri, 11 Nov 2005 16:55:41 -0600 reply-type=original with any abuse report |
| References: | <20051111083056.97A54D5E6@smtpout-3204.bay.webtv.net> <4374C378.8070006@earthlink.net> <001201c5e6e6$af859140$6500a8c0@Jleclainche1> <43750C7D.1090909@earthlink.net> <4375125F.6020907@earthlink.net> <437514C3.1010709@earthlink.net> |
>>> Again, laziness. But that was fortunate for you, for if a report had been taken and a complaint filed, it would have been against you. No matter how many cars are involved in a series of rear-enders, tail end Charlie is the one stuck without anyone to sue and who will be the one cited! Whether we like it or not, no matter how stupid a driver might have acted, anyone who rear ends him is the guilty party! Wait a minute, Buster!!! You were the one just a few eeks ago who assured us that, due to the "swoop and stoop" insurance fraud issues, this was no longer the case. Please make up your mind! David Lieb |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: AZ and NM LBC-friendly?, Unknown |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: CA- no insurance..., Unknown |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: CA- no insurance..., Unknown |
| Next by Thread: | Re: CA- no insurance..., Unknown |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |