Trevor,
First, I would think this would be pretty inefficient. You would be converting
kinetic energy to electric, then back to kinetic. Each change would have
significant losses, so your engine would be expending more power to drive the
supercharger than on a normal setup.
Second, you would also need to control compressor speed to parrallel engine
speed or else boost at idle would very high, while boost at redline would be
almost nonexistant (probably about opposite of what you want). Then again, if
set up with a map sensor it could certainly give some flexibility, say little
or no boost during "normal" driving, and moderate boost for "spirited" driving,
and high boost for autocross/race driving.
Anyway, having considered an inline turbine fan in a ram air type system (blow
through supercharging) for some time, these are my excuses for not trying it.
Tom Gentry
Life is too short to drive boring cars!
-----Original Message-----
From: Trevor Jordan [SMTP:tjordan@vic.bigpond.net.au]
Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 1998 10:40 AM
To: rstieg; triumphs@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: ersatz turbo.
At 11:27 PM +1000 1/9/98, rstieg wrote:
>The post about air whistling through air cleaners sounding like a turbo got
>me to thinking:
>what pitch would approximate a Merlin engine at about 25 inches boost?
>how 'bout the siren used by the Stuka?
>Tape of a Ferrari in fourth gear??
>Will probably settle for a playing card up against the cooling fan.
>rick stieg 75 spit (noisy enough)
Has anyone ever considered an electric supercharger? Apart from avoiding
pulley alignment problems and space restrictions around the engine, it
could be switched on and off from the driver's seat and, with appropriate
controls, the boost could even be varied progressively.
Tell me if it has already been done or why it would not work and I will go
back to the corner.
Trevor Jordan
74 TR6 CF29281U
|