triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Of interest to concerns of unleaded fuel usage

To: "'Joe Curry'" <spitlist@gte.net>, craig skitt <caskitt@hotmail.com>
Subject: RE: Of interest to concerns of unleaded fuel usage
From: "Mitchell, Douglas (D.B.)" <dmitchel@ford.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 10:18:44 -0500charset="iso-8859-1"
Cc: triumphs@autox.team.net, spitfires@autox.team.net
I have to agree with Joe. I have been running my '73 since about '82
on an exclusive diet of unleaded. If you have any questions, I would
recommend a paper on the British car archives on valves.

ftp://ftp.team.net/sol/valves.txt

This was also referenced in a past issue of Triumph World, in the
Down Under section.

Cheers,

Doug Mitchell
mailto:dmitchel@ismi.net
mailto:dmitchel@ford.com
'73 Spitfire 1500


-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Curry [mailto:spitlist@gte.net]
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 1999 9:16 AM
To: craig skitt
Cc: CraigS@iewc.com; bschwart@pacbell.net; triumphs@autox.team.net;
spitfires@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: Of interest to concerns of unleaded fuel usage



Craig,
I have been burning unleaded fuel in my Mk1 (with 1500 engine) for the
past 3 years and have had no problems.  I think this unleaded thing,
like the Y2K thing has been greatly exaggerated!

Regards,
Joe

craig skitt wrote:
> 
> On the topic of unleaded fuel, is anyone relatively confident that
unleaded
> petrol can be used with no detriment to the spit, as certain car magazines
> state that it cannot be used.
> 
> Craig Skitt
> Inca Yellow 1976 1500 O/D
> W.Mids
> England.
> 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>