triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Century not over till 2001

To: "David Massey" <105671.471@compuserve.com>, "Alan Crane" <acrane@crosslink.net>
Subject: Re: Century not over till 2001
From: "T. O. Miller" <tomiller@fuse.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 1999 17:30:07 -0500charset="iso-8859-1"
Cc: "[unknown]" <triumphs@autox.team.net>
References: <199912301453_MC2-92E6-441F@compuserve.com>
Actually the movie with Ringo (and Shelley Long) was "Caveman" and would
therefore be unaffected. The movie with Raquel would become One Million and
One Years B.C. Yuch!

T.O.M.   :)


----- Original Message -----
From: David Massey <105671.471@compuserve.com>
To: Alan Crane <acrane@crosslink.net>
Cc: [unknown] <triumphs@autox.team.net>
Sent: Thursday, December 30, 1999 2:53 PM
Subject: Re: Century not over till 2001


>
> Message text written by Alan Crane
> >
>
> There is an easy solution for reconciling tomorrow as the end of the
> millenium even for the nitpickers.
> Lets simply redefine 1 BC as 0 AD.  Then all our current years remain
> the same.  Since we don't know exactly when Jesus was born, it doesn't
> really matter when we start then current era. Technically all BC years
> should be adjusted by 1, but who really cares about them?  No Triumphs
> around then anyway.
>
> Alan
> <
>
> But then the movie with Rachel and Ringo would be 10001 BC.  That's no
> good.
>
> Dave


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>