Re: Century not over till 2001

triumphs

Re: Century not over till 2001

To:	triumphs@autox.team.net
Subject:	Re: Century not over till 2001
From:	Mark Kinlocke <Mark@locklyn-agencies.demon.co.uk>
Date:	Thu, 30 Dec 1999 22:52:41 +0000
References:	<386B79BA.8A0961A1@crosslink.net>

> Technically all BC years should be adjusted by 1, but who really cares
about them?  No Triumphs around then anyway.
Who says so?
Didn't the bible record that someone's army entered Jericho in Triumph?
And when Jesus was born didn't the angels Hark and sing in a Herald?
-- 
Mark Kinlocke

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Century not over till 2001, Kevin N. Andrews Re: Century not over till 2001, Michael D. Porter RE: Century not over till 2001, Ken Gano Re: Century not over till 2001, David Massey Century not over till 2001, David Massey Re: Century not over till 2001, Beth & Ken Re: Century not over till 2001, Alan Crane Re: Century not over till 2001, David Massey Re: Century not over till 2001, T. O. Miller Re: Century not over till 2001, John T. Nichols Re: Century not over till 2001, Mark Kinlocke <= Re: Century not over till 2001, David Massey Re: Century not over till 2001, David Massey

Previous by Date:	Re: The Roadster Factory demise, Mark Kinlocke
Next by Date:	Happy New Year, Tom Ambrose
Previous by Thread:	Re: Century not over till 2001, John T. Nichols
Next by Thread:	Re: Century not over till 2001, David Massey
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]