triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TR] Triumphs Digest, Vol 4, Issue 16

To: triumphs@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: [TR] Triumphs Digest, Vol 4, Issue 16
From: dave1massey@cs.com
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 10:07:31 -0400 (EDT)
 Indeed.  Best commercial practices call out full engagement with some exposed
thread  I've seen Mil Specs that call out two full exposed threads.  This
doesn't add strength but it does aid in visual inspection for compliance.
Also, I've been told that any engaged thread length in excess of the fastener
diameter doesn't add any strenght, either.  But having a bolt that doesn't
protrude through the nut leaves one wondering just how much engagement there
really is.  As Jerry said, I would advise against it.

Dave








-----Original Message-----
From: John Herrera <jrherrera90@hotmail.com>
To: tr3driver <tr3driver@ca.rr.com>; dkspence <dkspence@telus.net>; Triumph
List <triumphs@autox.team.net>
Sent: Fri, Jun 17, 2011 9:10 pm
Subject: Re: [TR] Triumphs Digest, Vol 4, Issue 16


> While I agree, I am curious : Has anyone actually had a short stud fail
when
> used with the steel wheel nuts (and not under racing conditions) ?
>
> I ran a lot of miles with steel wheels on wire wheel studs and never had
any
> problems. Of course I'd never suggest doing that to anyone else!
>
> -- Randall

A former member of my local club ran steel wheels on short studs. He used the
deeper lug nuts for steel wheels. The threads only engaged about half the nut
depth. This always gave me the willies because I was taught that one thread
should protrude from the nut.

But, I can't recall this causing any problems.

Even so, I'm not advocating it.

John H.
triumphs@autox.team.net

Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
Unsubscribe:
http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/triumphs/dave1massey@cs.com
triumphs@autox.team.net

Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>