Mail Archive Search: <+from:jemitchell@compuserve.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:jemitchell@compuserve.com: 461 ]

Total 461 documents matching your query.

21. Re: minimum weight requirement (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 09:41:24 -0500; elsewhere in the Where do the Prepared rules _ever_ reference "with driver?" I haven't found such a reference. Only if you can somehow make yourself believe that the "driver" is inherently part of th; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00273.html (12,621 bytes)
22. Re: minimum weight requirement (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 12:20:28 -0500; (Honda del Well, first you have the 7" rim width limitation in ITS, whereas most SP competitors in the smaller cars are running at least 8" rims (some FWD cars run 9s on the front and 8s on the rear); /html/autox/2002-10/msg00275.html (10,182 bytes)
23. Re: minimum weight requirement (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 13:10:52 -0500; whereas 8" Don't underestimate the added grip that wider rims afford. Given the choice between wider _tires_ or wider_ wheels_, I'd almost always go with the latter. very high end I disagree. It's po; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00277.html (10,618 bytes)
24. Re: db Level Question (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 20:21:47 -0500; Jim Ourand queried: Umm, yep. A 3 dB increase represents a doubling of the acoustic power radiated by the source. A 10 dB increase is generally characterized as "twice as loud," based on subjective s; /html/autox/2002-10/msg00357.html (7,245 bytes)
25. Re: SM2 at Topeka (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 12:33:55 -0500; trophying. And I claim that there's nothing at all wrong with doing that. drivers having a steal a SM "Steal?" No, "win." It's a National class, and everyone has as much right to enter it as the folk; /html/autox/2002-08/msg00069.html (11,277 bytes)
26. Re: SM2 at Topeka (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 14:05:24 -0500; driving faster.<s> That previous weekend) before This had already gone too far before the above comment, but it is now time to set the record straight about the Fordahl AP entry that year. Here are s; /html/autox/2002-08/msg00081.html (10,294 bytes)
27. Re: Who are your top PAX drivers? (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 07:11:21 -0500; charts at Here in Texas, we see Mark Madarash at or near the top of almost every event. Other drivers that come to mind: Tommy Saunders, CM Neal Bellamy, FS Denny Feigenspan, FS Dakota Southerland, F; /html/autox/2002-08/msg00228.html (7,778 bytes)
28. Re: Interesting suspension question (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 07:04:04 -0600; You have it pretty well figured out. If you raise the RC height and leave the CG height alone, you'll reduce the roll compliance. The effect is the same as stiffening the swaybar or springs at that e; /html/autox/2002-04/msg00003.html (9,198 bytes)
29. Re: Interesting suspension question (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 13:15:06 -0600; transfer will occur center roll center to due to couple That's correct. You don't have to wait for the springs to compress for the "non-rolling overturning moment" (per Milliken) to become effective.; /html/autox/2002-04/msg00027.html (8,534 bytes)
30. Re: That dreaded Computer in an RX-7 (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 12:10:44 -0600; I don't think so. In the case of software, the rule requires (and has always required) that any part of the ECU code - including look-up tables - that controls boost be identical to that portion of t; /html/autox/2002-03/msg00003.html (8,213 bytes)
31. Re: [evolution-disc.] Rules Clarification / Protest Bait (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 13:16:20 -0600; factory >replacement is now a different piston that bumps the CR significantly. If that piston indeed supersedes the original part - i.e., the factory discontinued the original one and now calls for; /html/autox/2002-03/msg00008.html (8,371 bytes)
32. Re: [evolution-disc.] Rules Clarification / Protest Bait (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 20:42:49 -0600; (not in original sequence) With which I agree. I would also add: "read the original query," which was regarding a Stock-Category car. the beginning Which is as far as you need to go for a Stock-Categ; /html/autox/2002-03/msg00018.html (11,252 bytes)
33. Re: [evolution-disc.] SM2 survival (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 17:44:19 -0600; for If you include SM as a "streetable" class, then you have to include SP. Why? Because SM allows _everything_ you can do in SP, and then some more. Lots and lots more. And Street Mod isn't? Hahahah; /html/autox/2002-03/msg00195.html (10,254 bytes)
34. Re: Proposed SP suspension rule for 2003 (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2002 07:47:08 -0600; about. You're reading it incorrectly. The proposed rule change _adds_ an allowance, but it does not take away anything that is already there. deficiencies The current SP allowances do _not_ allow one; /html/autox/2002-03/msg00515.html (10,114 bytes)
35. Re: Proposed SP suspension rule for 2003 (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2002 14:08:50 -0600; event of a alignment. As required to Given that no other Category requires alignment within the factory-specified range of values, do you really think that this will become a requirement for SP? The; /html/autox/2002-03/msg00517.html (8,850 bytes)
36. Re: Proposed SP suspension rule for 2003 (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2002 06:38:57 -0600; specs at That's my take on it. The way I read the proposed rule, you can use shims or eccentrics not allowed elsewhere, for example, to return your camber to factory spec after you've lowered the car; /html/autox/2002-03/msg00523.html (8,998 bytes)
37. Re: Rule Books (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 09:21:58 -0600; Wow, you mean we should tailor our rules for the folks who actually want to autocross? That's a pretty radical concept, Dave. ;<) Seriously, I'm in total agreement. There's a large faction of "car gu; /html/autox/2002-02/msg00192.html (8,007 bytes)
38. Re: Rule Books (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 11:53:15 -0600; autoxer's wanted to Well, the subject says only "Rule Books," and the discussion in recent posts has been about non-autocrossers' complaints. Fastrack is online, so recent rules changes are readily a; /html/autox/2002-02/msg00199.html (7,951 bytes)
39. Tractor Batteries (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 13:36:56 -0600; cranking amps temperature FWIW, I had an Autozone Lawn and Garden battery in my 86 VW GTI, back before the "same size and type" battery restriction was introduced into the Stock rules. I cranked the; /html/autox/2002-02/msg00207.html (7,968 bytes)
40. Re: Let's Talk about car Magazines! (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 21:08:53 -0600; 1. NAP - for obvious reasons. 2. Sports Car - ditto. 3. Sports Car International - outstanding editorial content, knowledgeable coverage of interesting vintage road and racing cars, unexcelled photog; /html/autox/2002-02/msg00242.html (8,342 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]