Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*transmissions\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*transmissions\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. transmissions (score: 1): Author: "Jim & Kay" <jscott16@netexpress.net>; Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 21:19:20 -0500; Will a TR4, 4A transmission bolt onto a 1960 TR3A without too much alteration such as starter and driveshaft? Thanks. Jim == This list supported in part by The Vintage Triumph Register == http://www.; /html/triumphs/2005-10/msg00755.html (7,165 bytes)
2. Re: transmissions (score: 1): Author: Geo Hahn <ahwahnee@cybertrails.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 19:32:58 -0700; If your commission number is greater than 50000 then I believe you are fine... if less than 50000 (early '59 which could have been sold as a '60) then you would have a starter problem. Geo Hahn == Th; /html/triumphs/2005-10/msg00757.html (7,483 bytes)
3. RE: transmissions (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 19:50:36 -0700; It's not too bad, assuming your TR3A really has 1960 parts and isn't a pre-TS50K model that spent too long on a dealer's lot (or has been swapped with earlier parts). Driveshaft, starter and clutch; /html/triumphs/2005-10/msg00759.html (7,727 bytes)
4. RE: transmissions (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 19:56:52 -0700; Come to think of it, even a pre-50K car won't have a starter problem. You'll keep the original starter, flywheel and clutch, which will fit into the later bellhousing. I had to change starters on TS; /html/triumphs/2005-10/msg00760.html (7,637 bytes)
5. Re: transmissions (score: 1): Author: TeriAnn Wakeman <twakeman@razzolink.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 06:08:37 -0700; Tr4 gearbox in a TR3A? Been there, done that wrote a web page www.tjwakeman.net/TR/gearbox_swap.htm Gee I was just thinking. Good thing they didn't have the web and digital cameras when I was growing; /html/triumphs/2005-10/msg00766.html (7,400 bytes)
6. RE: transmissions (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 10:24:41 -0700; TeriAnn, are you sure about the TR6 gearbox being longer than the TR4 ? I know the front flange is thicker (as well as the rest of the case), but I thought the flange to flange dimensions were the s; /html/triumphs/2005-10/msg00767.html (7,976 bytes)
7. RE: transmissions (score: 1): Author: "Mark Hooper" <mhooper@digiscreen.ca>; Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 13:59:06 -0400; "What is this thing called, Love? Too shy to say, don't worry I'll just post a picture to the Internet and ask everybody"... Nope, doesn't bear thinking about. :^) Mark Tr4 gearbox in a TR3A? Been th; /html/triumphs/2005-10/msg00768.html (7,844 bytes)
8. Re: transmissions (score: 1): Author: James Ruffner <jar@aldermanroad.net>; Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 17:18:53 -0400; The only change between the -3s and -4s lies in the much older (not as of Commission no. less than 60000) TRs that used what was called a "long nose" starter. This starter required a different bell h; /html/triumphs/2005-10/msg00773.html (7,902 bytes)
9. Re: transmissions (score: 1): Author: TeriAnn Wakeman <twakeman@razzolink.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 15:11:41 -0700; The one installation I saw required a flange to be flattened out and new holes. I saw it before things were buttoned up. I did not actually try it myself but I assume that Greg Solow at The Engine R; /html/triumphs/2005-10/msg00776.html (7,801 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]