Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Battery\s+Testing\s+\-\s+Consumer\s+Reports\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Battery\s+Testing\s+\-\s+Consumer\s+Reports\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. Battery Testing - Consumer Reports (score: 1): Author: "Bob Danielson" <75TR6@tr6.danielsonfamily.org>; Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 09:09:06 -0400; For the "For What It's Worth" department... Consumer Reports just completed their battery tests and the top rated batteries in every category are the "no names". NAPA, Duralast, Ever Start, Nascar te; /html/triumphs/2005-10/msg00413.html (8,268 bytes)
2. RE: Battery Testing - Consumer Reports (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 08:14:09 -0700; Meaning they weren't tested ? Randall == This list supported in part by The Vintage Triumph Register == http://www.vtr.org; /html/triumphs/2005-10/msg00416.html (7,799 bytes)
3. Re: Battery Testing - Consumer Reports (score: 1): Author: ZinkZ10C@aol.com; Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 18:39:46 EDT; << Consumer Reports just completed their battery tests and the top rated batteries in every category are the "no names" >> There are only a few name battery manufacturers but you can find their name; /html/triumphs/2005-10/msg00419.html (9,145 bytes)
4. RE: Battery Testing - Consumer Reports (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 19:37:29 -0700; I appreciate the effort Bob, but really no need. I just wasn't sure I understood your comment. As Harold noted, I don't trust CU ... ever since that business with the Suzuki Samurai. Their research; /html/triumphs/2005-10/msg00425.html (8,550 bytes)
5. Re: Battery Testing - Consumer Reports (score: 1): Author: philip ethier <pethier@isd.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 22:44:25 -0500; Well, what kind of car was it? Phil Ethier West Side Saint Paul Minnesota USA 1962 TR4 CT2846L, 1992 Saturn SL2, 1993 Suburban, 1994 Miata C package pethier@isd.net http://www.mnautox.com/ http://ww; /html/triumphs/2005-10/msg00427.html (8,572 bytes)
6. RE: Battery Testing - Consumer Reports (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 21:21:34 -0700; 1980 Chevy Citation hatchback with a 2.8 V6 & 4-speed OD. Definitely not a great car in any respect, but it did a lot of things well, including taking it easy on my pocketbook. Good power, 30 mpg on; /html/triumphs/2005-10/msg00428.html (9,745 bytes)
7. Re: Battery Testing - Consumer Reports (score: 1): Author: TeriAnn Wakeman <twakeman@razzolink.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 06:41:51 -0700; Consumer reports once published an article on high end speakers in which they panned Bose (about 25 yrs ago). Bose sued them. The Bose case was based upon Consumer Reports test protocols being faulty; /html/triumphs/2005-10/msg00436.html (9,488 bytes)
8. Re: Battery Testing - Consumer Reports (score: 1): Author: zoboherald@aol.com; Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 10:05:48 -0400; Consumer reports once published an article on high end speakers in which they panned Bose (about 25 yrs ago). Bose sued them. The Bose case was based upon Consumer Reports test protocols being faulty; /html/triumphs/2005-10/msg00437.html (9,627 bytes)
9. Re: Battery Testing - Consumer Reports (score: 1): Author: Michael Porter <portermd@zianet.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 09:12:41 -0600; I worked for Bose, once, a long time ago. Horrible management. Manipulative beyond description. A week in their plant and I thought I was an extra in Fritz Lang's _Metropolis_, everyone walking aroun; /html/triumphs/2005-10/msg00440.html (10,332 bytes)
10. Re: Battery Testing - Consumer Reports (score: 1): Author: "John Runge" <johnrunge1@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 12:14:49 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time); Guess you never worked for UPS John --Original Message-- I worked for Bose, once, a long time ago. Horrible management. Manipulative beyond description. A week in their plant and I thought I was an e; /html/triumphs/2005-10/msg00444.html (10,890 bytes)
11. Re: Battery Testing - Consumer Reports (score: 1): Author: BearTranserv@aol.com; Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 12:33:54 EDT; As Harold noted, I don't trust CU Definitely to be read with Randal's salt shaker handy. I'm old enough to remember when they downgraded foreign cars for having the headlight dimmer on a stalk instea; /html/triumphs/2005-10/msg00446.html (8,653 bytes)
12. Re: Battery Testing - Consumer Reports (score: 1): Author: BearTranserv@aol.com; Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 12:41:13 EDT; Guess you never worked for UPS John Must have been similar to working for RPS the UPS competitor. I was "in company" for about seven years and have never looked back... Robert B. Houston Texan in New; /html/triumphs/2005-10/msg00447.html (8,653 bytes)
13. Re: Battery Testing - Consumer Reports (score: 1): Author: "pethier@isd.net" <pethier@isd.net>; Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:59:21 -0500; Just so it's clear from the ">"s. I didn't write that. I was quoting that to ask what kind of car it was. It was an X-car. My father had one, too (Buick Skylark) and it was OK except the cruise cont; /html/triumphs/2005-10/msg00449.html (8,767 bytes)
14. Re: Battery Testing - Consumer Reports (score: 1): Author: Don Spence <dkspence@telus.net>; Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 14:11:35 -0600; Not at all surprising. My friendly neighbourhood appliance repair man always recommends buying "house brand" from the major retailers. His experience is that , although they are built in the same pla; /html/triumphs/2005-10/msg00466.html (10,283 bytes)
15. RE: Battery Testing - Consumer Reports (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 15:51:14 -0700; Cruise control was only available on the 3-speed automatic versions. IMO the 4-speed manual made a world of difference in the car's performance (I drove both before deciding). Better fuel mileage too; /html/triumphs/2005-10/msg00479.html (8,191 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]