Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Cone\s+Mulligans\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Cone\s+Mulligans\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Cone Mulligans (score: 1): Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>; Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1999 15:06:19 -0600; How about ruling that no two consecutive cones on the same side of the car, and no two out of three consecutive slalom cones, can be bought as mulligans? Then if you really want to prevent a mulligan; /html/autox/1999-11/msg00524.html (9,070 bytes)
2. Re: Cone Mulligans (score: 1): Author: Craig Blome <cblome@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1999 13:45:20 -0800 (PST); I dunno, it sounds like the idea is getting bogged down in the accounting. I still think treating an entire run as a mulligan would be more practicable (at least there would be fewer nervous breakdow; /html/autox/1999-11/msg00530.html (7,806 bytes)
3. Re: Cone Mulligans (score: 1): Author: John Lieberman <johnlee@softdisk.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1999 15:49:43 -0600; Yep! More good suggestions. You could also limit the total number of mulligans that any one person could buy for the entire day and the total number that could be used on any single run to, say, two?; /html/autox/1999-11/msg00531.html (7,898 bytes)
4. Re: Cone Mulligans (score: 1): Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>; Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1999 16:08:49 -0600; the more I think about it, my "three-for-free" rule in the Mirror Khana is sort of a Mulligan rule. Here's how it works. Mirror Khana is the event that uses no clocks. Two drivers run heads-up agains; /html/autox/1999-11/msg00534.html (9,802 bytes)
5. Re: Cone Mulligans (score: 1): Author: John Lieberman <johnlee@softdisk.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1999 17:51:21 -0600; You're right! And it seems to have worked quite well over all these many years. (big snippage) Absolutely! And, if you do it right, the end result could be an absolute hoot!!! John (Old Fartz & TLS #; /html/autox/1999-11/msg00542.html (7,256 bytes)
6. RE: Cone Mulligans (score: 1): Author: Engstrom <engstrom@onramp.net>; Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1999 18:27:34 -0600; Agreed! Careful course design and a limit on the number of "mulligans" will ensure safety! Craig, the disadvantage of your idea (having an entire run be a "mulligan") would be, IMO, a psychological d; /html/autox/1999-11/msg00544.html (7,859 bytes)
7. RE: Cone Mulligans (score: 1): Author: "Glen E. Thompson" <glen.thompson@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1999 22:41:08 -0500; Ever since I've read about Rocky's mirror-khana, I've been very jealous. I would love to have a place to stage one. I'm having a hard enough time with finding suitable parking lots. If I were doing a; /html/autox/1999-11/msg00559.html (8,441 bytes)
8. Re: Cone mulligans (score: 1): Author: "Glen E. Thompson" <glen.thompson@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1999 23:05:59 -0500; One way would be to use two different color cones. The orange cones next to the car can be discounted via the mulligan. The yellow cone two feet inside it would DQ the run. One could design a safe ou; /html/autox/1999-11/msg00560.html (9,468 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]