Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TR\s+4\s+NEGATIVE\s+CAMBER\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TR\s+4\s+NEGATIVE\s+CAMBER\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. TR 4 NEGATIVE CAMBER (score: 1): Author: Jim Elbe <JElbe@superflow.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 13:27:07 -0600; What's the best way to get some on a TR 4 ?? RMVR will not let you change mounting points or use non-standard components. I've read the book about heating and bending the uprights. Is this still the; /html/fot/2001-10/msg00167.html (7,635 bytes)
2. Re: TR 4 NEGATIVE CAMBER (score: 1): Author: "Jack W. Drews" <vinttr4@geneseo.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 15:01:44 +0000; It can be done by heating and bending the uprights. I shorten the upper a-arms to get negative camber. I've done about a dozen sets for folks. I don't know if RMVR allows this, but early SCCA rules w; /html/fot/2001-10/msg00168.html (9,084 bytes)
3. Re: TR 4 NEGATIVE CAMBER (score: 1): Author: Justin <jmwagner@greenheart.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 14:00:22 -0700; I just skimmed through research materials and found the following. (Some doesn't apply to your specific request, but it still might be of interest to others.) --Justin Wagner "To reduce the positive; /html/fot/2001-10/msg00170.html (9,141 bytes)
4. Re: TR 4 NEGATIVE CAMBER (score: 1): Author: "Jack W. Drews" <vinttr4@geneseo.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 17:21:14 +0000; See below What Tim Suddard said in GRM must have been true with the springs and spacer setup he had at the time but is was different on the chassis I measured. I thought the TR community might be int; /html/fot/2001-10/msg00171.html (10,103 bytes)
5. RE: TR 4 NEGATIVE CAMBER (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 16:04:47 -0700; How far do you want to go with this? Negative camber isn't the only suspension modification that's a good idea, you also want to bring the roll center upwards--the stock roll center is several feet u; /html/fot/2001-10/msg00172.html (10,703 bytes)
6. RE: TR 4 NEGATIVE CAMBER (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 16:17:28 -0700; Interesting measurements. I'm going to do some extensive testing and measuring on Peyote this winter and play with the front and rear suspension to try to get rid of some of the understeer. Just a no; /html/fot/2001-10/msg00173.html (11,391 bytes)
7. Re: TR 4 NEGATIVE CAMBER (score: 1): Author: "John Herrera" <jherrera@fcc.cc.md.us>; Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2001 10:19:04 -0400; I don't know what you should do to change the camber, but I would not heat the uprights and beat them with a hammer. It sounds like a bad idea. J.R. <<< Jim Elbe <JElbe@superflow.com> 10/12 3:26p >>; /html/fot/2001-10/msg00179.html (7,895 bytes)
8. RE: TR 4 NEGATIVE CAMBER (score: 1): Author: "Brad Eells" <bradlnss@lightspeed.net>; Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2001 08:23:26 -0700; Are we talking about modifying the newer - late TR4 - TR6 suspension design or the earlier TR3 style A-arms?? Thanks, Brad 62 TR4 - early suspension; /html/fot/2001-10/msg00180.html (7,269 bytes)
9. Re: TR 4 NEGATIVE CAMBER (score: 1): Author: WEmery7451@aol.com; Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2001 11:48:19 EDT; << I don't know what you should do to change the camber, but I would not heat the uprights and beat them with a hammer. It sounds like a bad idea. Many years ago, I transferred the springs from the f; /html/fot/2001-10/msg00181.html (8,547 bytes)
10. Re: TR 4 NEGATIVE CAMBER (score: 1): Author: "R. Kastner" <kaskas@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2001 13:39:56 -0700; Because of the regulations at that time ( late 50's) wherein NOTHING could be changed or added we did bend the upright with lots of heat. Simple stuff to do and good material. The plan then was, just; /html/fot/2001-10/msg00182.html (8,850 bytes)
11. Re: TR 4 NEGATIVE CAMBER (score: 1): Author: "Ronald R Gates" <Ronald.R.Gates@usa.dupont.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 08:14:28 -0400; I was wondering about the MGB-GT front springs . There are two available , part no. BHH-10-77 early and BHH-1225 late . Does anyone know which is the correct spring to use ? I also heard that the spr; /html/fot/2001-10/msg00197.html (7,078 bytes)
12. Re: TR 4 NEGATIVE CAMBER (score: 1): Author: Henry Frye <thefryes@iconn.net>; Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 10:18:52 -0400; I tried to run a set these springs from Moss USofA. I got the early springs, my theory being the later springs were for the rubber bumper cars, thus being higher. Compared to the Triumph Competition; /html/fot/2001-10/msg00201.html (8,376 bytes)
13. Re: TR 4 NEGATIVE CAMBER (score: 1): Author: "Bob Kramer" <rgk@flash.net>; Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 09:48:20 -0500; Last year I ordered comp springs from Triumphtune for the TR4A project. 2 other FOTer's ordered with me (a TR6 and TR250) and I don't know if any of us have the cars on the road with these springs. I; /html/fot/2001-10/msg00202.html (9,592 bytes)
14. RE: TR 4 NEGATIVE CAMBER (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 08:52:50 -0700; There are a lot of spring manufacturers in the US, some of them can take even one-off orders. Four years ago I had three sets made in 50# increments for the cost of one from Moss at Benz Spring here; /html/fot/2001-10/msg00204.html (10,123 bytes)
15. Re: TR 4 NEGATIVE CAMBER (score: 1): Author: "andrew stark" <whitedog72@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 16:06:06; I run Triumph Tune springs on my Gt-6. So far have been great. I ordered all of the sizes they had available and it was really not that expensive. I am not sure Triumph Tune is even still in bussines; /html/fot/2001-10/msg00205.html (11,131 bytes)
16. Re: TR 4 NEGATIVE CAMBER (score: 1): Author: John Wilkins <john@race-dogs.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 09:15:33 -0700; Having testing spring rates and shock packages in my spit this year. If your group allows it. Call you favorite speed shop(re: pegasus, trueshoice) and get your self some Eibachs, Hypercoil, or H&R'; /html/fot/2001-10/msg00206.html (9,457 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]