Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Torque\s+or\s+not\s+more\s+torque\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Torque\s+or\s+not\s+more\s+torque\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Torque or not more torque (score: 1): Author: Jay_Laifman@countrywide.com; Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 17:52:51 -0700; "Together with the Holbay camshaft and the correct Webers and right air filter (look up! the carb set-up is very sensitive to the air filter) you get a torque engine. Its not a high RPM engine! This; /html/alpines/2003-05/msg00085.html (7,868 bytes)
2. SV: Torque or not more torque (score: 1): Author: KKJ <kkj@privat.utfors.se>; Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 11:30:20 +0200; What I meant was: This is not a racing engine, it's more torque then you would Remember that the Hunter GLS or Rapier H120 engine is a detuned engine. The original (around 125bhp) was considered to "; /html/alpines/2003-05/msg00087.html (8,812 bytes)
3. Re: Torque or not more torque (score: 1): Author: Jay_Laifman@countrywide.com; Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 08:16:10 -0700; Well, what you are describing is what Rootes did to the Holbay engine, and exactly what I was saying. You are giving up on high end power for low end power. Nothing is free in this balance. Remember,; /html/alpines/2003-05/msg00089.html (10,102 bytes)
4. RE: Torque or not more torque (score: 1): Author: "Jarrid Gross" <jgross@econolite.com>; Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 08:58:58 -0700; Jay and piners. The holbay H120 engine is a paradox. The published cam timing data would suggest that it is a higher RPM engine due to its overlap and duration, only that it also has a lot of cam adv; /html/alpines/2003-05/msg00090.html (12,434 bytes)
5. Re: Torque or not more torque (score: 1): Author: RootesRooter@aol.com; Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 12:37:36 EDT; << My point is still that throwing on the Holbay head, cam and Webers does not make the Alpine a low rpm torque puller - and a 3.7 rear end could cause too much lugging on the engine. Remember that J; /html/alpines/2003-05/msg00091.html (8,129 bytes)
6. SV: Torque or not more torque (score: 1): Author: KKJ <kkj@privat.utfors.se>; Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 19:13:26 +0200; Yes, then we all agree! Kristian J -- Ursprungligt meddelande -- Fren: "Jarrid Gross" <jgross@econolite.com> Till: <Jay_Laifman@countrywide.com>; "Bruce Davis" <phyrman5@earthlink.net> Kopia: <alpine; /html/alpines/2003-05/msg00092.html (14,399 bytes)
7. Re: Torque or not more torque (score: 1): Author: jumpinjan <jservaites@woh.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 17:13:54 -0700; What is the ratio of the Alpine's rocker arm? Is it 1.5:1 or about 1.35:1 or something? Do you have some Alpine cam profile data that you would like to share? I have done some research on various ca; /html/alpines/2003-05/msg00093.html (7,478 bytes)
8. RE: Torque or not more torque (score: 1): Author: "Jarrid Gross" <jgross@econolite.com>; Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 14:22:32 -0700; The rocker arm ratios vary "as measured" from 1.28 to 1.35 depending on the level of drunken-ness of the worker that made them. I cherry pick mine. I have ground 3 cams. Dont have the specs in fron; /html/alpines/2003-05/msg00094.html (8,072 bytes)
9. RE: Torque or not more torque (score: 1): Author: "Tom Hill" <tom.hill@att.net>; Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 10:40:59 -0500; It is my understanding that Rootes contracted with Holbay to produce a performance version of the fastback Alpine. The prototype that was delivered to Rootes was very fast but had lousy low end perfo; /html/alpines/2003-05/msg00102.html (9,478 bytes)
10. SV: Torque or not more torque (score: 1): Author: KKJ <kkj@privat.utfors.se>; Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 20:41:11 +0200; It's a good idea to use the standard head to work on. The Holbay ports are not exactly "polished" but the sharp edge in the inlet close to the valve is taken away and it is smother. The exhaust on th; /html/alpines/2003-05/msg00104.html (10,523 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]