Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*URGENT\s+FEDERAL\s+SCRAPPAGE\s+ALERT\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*URGENT\s+FEDERAL\s+SCRAPPAGE\s+ALERT\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. URGENT FEDERAL SCRAPPAGE ALERT (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 11:02:20 -0800 (PST); URGENT FEDERAL SCRAPPAGE ALERT Please read this article on the Hemmings site. This bill WILL affect our hobby, and some of our lively hood. Just click the link below or type it in you address window; /html/spridgets/2002-01/msg00009.html (7,446 bytes)
2. Re: URGENT FEDERAL SCRAPPAGE ALERT (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2002 20:00:37 -0500; Be aware that if you read this article and then the actual content of the bill (S.1766), you get a bit of a different story. The actual bill applies only to DRIVEABLE cars (currently registered and o; /html/spridgets/2002-01/msg00018.html (9,578 bytes)
3. Re: URGENT FEDERAL SCRAPPAGE ALERT (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 20:23:22 -0500; Some people rate things according to the effort people need to take to accomplish it. Having to address an envelope and put a stamp on it as well as mail it would seem to make you a more determined p; /html/spridgets/2002-01/msg00022.html (8,315 bytes)
4. Re: URGENT FEDERAL SCRAPPAGE ALERT (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2002 18:08:47 -0800; I just read the bill. It says nothing of crushing the cars. It clearly states, "... requires that all passenger automobiles and light-duty trucks turned in be scrapped... provides an appropriate paym; /html/spridgets/2002-01/msg00025.html (9,285 bytes)
5. Re: URGENT FEDERAL SCRAPPAGE ALERT (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 22:05:51 -0500; I believe your are reading the proper intent of the law correctly. These laws are designed to 'unclutter' the countryside of the approx. 2 million cars a year that are 'left on the side of the road'; /html/spridgets/2002-01/msg00028.html (8,546 bytes)
6. Re: URGENT FEDERAL SCRAPPAGE ALERT (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 22:55:57 EST; A politician I trust...what's the word? oxymoron? RH 74 Midget...Running! now just the little things, adjust valves, replace air filters, change oil, fix tach, fix speedo, fix 4-way flasher, etc, etc; /html/spridgets/2002-01/msg00034.html (8,540 bytes)
7. Re: URGENT FEDERAL SCRAPPAGE ALERT (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2002 07:17:50 -0500; The reason for the request for no snail mail is the Senate is more afraid of anthrax then the rest of the population, except maybe our House of Reprehensibles. Also the snail mail to the senate and h; /html/spridgets/2002-01/msg00037.html (9,937 bytes)
8. Re: URGENT FEDERAL SCRAPPAGE ALERT (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 08:12:14 EST; Which leaves the interpretation of the bill, if passed, to the political process and to politicians. That sounds very dangerous to me. This is an angle to be worked should the Bill actually pass, or; /html/spridgets/2002-01/msg00041.html (8,762 bytes)
9. Re: URGENT FEDERAL SCRAPPAGE ALERT (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 08:20:39 EST; I have trouble believing this, Paul, as the Scrappage language is part of an "energy" bill and not a beautification bill. It seems to be a collusion between the government and the automobile industry; /html/spridgets/2002-01/msg00042.html (9,290 bytes)
10. Re: URGENT FEDERAL SCRAPPAGE ALERT (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 08:40:36 -0500; Excellent point about the beautification vs 'energy'. I wonder if anyone considers how much energy it takes to make a new car vs the energy differential of running a new vs old car. I'd guess you'd; /html/spridgets/2002-01/msg00043.html (10,396 bytes)
11. Re: URGENT FEDERAL SCRAPPAGE ALERT (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 08:42:00 -0500; This type of bill has come up before and I believe the last time it came up at a state level (California) it got shot down. The premise of 'old cars' and mpg ratings is a joke! The current U.S. new c; /html/spridgets/2002-01/msg00044.html (10,871 bytes)
12. Re: URGENT FEDERAL SCRAPPAGE ALERT (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2002 10:01:47 -0500; No David, Parts cars i.e. Non running cars do not get paid for!!! Only registered and operating cars. I do agree that whomever is administering the bill is likely to be the one that decides if they g; /html/spridgets/2002-01/msg00050.html (10,586 bytes)
13. Re: URGENT FEDERAL SCRAPPAGE ALERT (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2002 07:50:05 -0800; I have gotten many a parts car "barely running", in order to drive it onto a trailer. Again, the bill in its present form leaves everything up to the states, as it should under the constitution, to b; /html/spridgets/2002-01/msg00054.html (9,808 bytes)
14. Re: URGENT FEDERAL SCRAPPAGE ALERT (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 11:06:08 EST; I did see an article a while back...Popular Science or Mechanics seems like, that mentioned the energy necessary to produce fuel cells far outweighed any mileage benefit. But then, I'm sure the cost; /html/spridgets/2002-01/msg00055.html (8,656 bytes)
15. Re: URGENT FEDERAL SCRAPPAGE ALERT (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 23:26:47 -0000; I cannot quote any actual reference, but in the UK where a high mileage car is anything over 120,000 it is a fact that more energy goes into production of the car that it uses throughout its operatin; /html/spridgets/2002-01/msg00080.html (9,394 bytes)
16. Re: URGENT FEDERAL SCRAPPAGE ALERT (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 07:07:54 EST; That is what I am thinking. /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Archives at http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/wilma/sprid; /html/spridgets/2002-01/msg00110.html (8,053 bytes)
17. Re: URGENT FEDERAL SCRAPPAGE ALERT (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 07:18:24 EST; There are many States, fortunately including my own, that do not require emissions testing. Would this wording mean we would then have a beaurocratic testing system set up in our State? What about th; /html/spridgets/2002-01/msg00112.html (8,580 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 17
Page: [1]