Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Update\s+to\s+Healey\s+100\s+Restoration\s+Site\s+\-\s+DMD\s+engine\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Update\s+to\s+Healey\s+100\s+Restoration\s+Site\s+\-\s+DMD\s+engine\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Update to Healey 100 Restoration Site - DMD engine (score: 1): Author: Larry Varley <varley@cosmos.net.au>; Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 19:50:24 +1000; Bob (and interested parties) The initial test run of the DMD engine produced the following - Horsepower 295 at 6000 RPM Torque 300 ft/lbs at 3500 RPM Test conditions98 octane fuel ( Shell Optimax unl; /html/healeys/2004-07/msg00355.html (8,256 bytes)
2. RE: Update to Healey 100 Restoration Site - DMD engine (score: 1): Author: "Patton Dickson" <kpdii@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 17:01:17 -0500; WOW close to double the 148HP of the last 3000's (almost x3 that of my How much HP were the works cars putting out? Bob (and interested parties) The initial test run of the DMD engine produced the fo; /html/healeys/2004-07/msg00372.html (8,898 bytes)
3. Re: Update to Healey 100 Restoration Site - DMD engine (score: 1): Author: John Miller <healeys@n4vu.com>; Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 18:57:34 -0400; And how much torque (for getting off the line) and also, how much torque did the 4.2 Jag E-type have? That was always my favorite when it came to pulling away from a stoplight -- what a torque monste; /html/healeys/2004-07/msg00378.html (8,631 bytes)
4. Re: Update to Healey 100 Restoration Site - DMD engine (score: 1): Author: "Bob Spidell" <bspidell@pacbell.net>; Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 18:37:04 -0700; If I recall the "Works Healey" book at all correctly, the last Works cars put out about 200hp and roughly 200lb-ft of torque. Think a stock 4.2 E-type might do 250/250. But a Healey is a bit lighter; /html/healeys/2004-07/msg00384.html (9,681 bytes)
5. RE: Update to Healey 100 Restoration Site - DMD engine (score: 1): Author: "Patton Dickson" <kpdii@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 21:33:12 -0500; What do you classify a Healey with a DMD motor (besides fast)? Wouldn't the motor make it non vintage in racing? What is the advantage the group is going after v. dropping in a 280Z motor or V8? I th; /html/healeys/2004-07/msg00388.html (8,980 bytes)
6. Re: Update to Healey 100 Restoration Site - DMD engine (score: 1): Author: "Bob Spidell" <bspidell@pacbell.net>; Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 22:19:25 -0700; Well, let's see ... a. more power--by a longshot--than a 280Z engine b. sound and smoothness of a straight-6 (not a V-8) c. straight drop-in replacement I like to keep my cars more-or-less stock/orig; /html/healeys/2004-07/msg00391.html (9,537 bytes)
7. Re: Update to Healey 100 Restoration Site - DMD engine (score: 1): Author: N5572B@aol.com; Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 01:39:35 EDT; So, what is this wonder engine going to cost if you were to put it on the market...twice the power and torque from and engine that LOOKS like the original and wieghs less...great combo...just dreamin; /html/healeys/2004-07/msg00392.html (8,244 bytes)
8. Re: Update to Healey 100 Restoration Site - DMD engine (score: 1): Author: Kent McLean <kentmclean@mindspring.com>; Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 10:44:43 -0400; Hmmm... I wonder if I could turn my BN2 into a BN3. Nah. -- Kent McLean '56 100 BN2; /html/healeys/2004-07/msg00401.html (8,290 bytes)
9. RE: Update to Healey 100 Restoration Site - DMD engine (score: 1): Author: "Quinn, Patrick" <Patrick.Quinn@det.nsw.edu.au>; Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 11:01:57 +1000; G'day Kent Why anyone would want to turn a well running BN2 into a cantankerous BN3 is quite beyond me. Not only would you have to modify the front cross chassis rail and X brace but then you you wou; /html/healeys/2004-07/msg00427.html (9,898 bytes)
10. RE: Update to Healey 100 Restoration Site - DMD engine (score: 1): Author: Kent McLean <kentmclean@mindspring.com>; Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 22:31:09 -0400; You're making a huge assumption that my BN2 is a well running example. It hasn't run since I bought it in 1974. It's missing the floors, the bottom 6" of the doors, most of the interior bits, and who; /html/healeys/2004-07/msg00429.html (8,726 bytes)
11. Re: Update to Healey 100 Restoration Site - DMD engine (score: 1): Author: Blue One Hundred <international_investor@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 19:34:13 -0700 (PDT); Without question I have always been interested in the work that DMD has been doing, and it is exciting for me to see that they finally have their 3.8 prototype up and running. This brings up two ver; /html/healeys/2004-07/msg00430.html (9,525 bytes)
12. Re: Update to Healey 100 Restoration Site - DMD engine (score: 1): Author: Dave & Marlene <rusd@velocitus.net>; Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 23:38:08 -0600; Hi Alan, I wouldn't presume to speak for Larry - only my personal experience. My first encounter with a Healey was to put a well built Chevy small block into a three year old BN2. I adapted the BN2 t; /html/healeys/2004-07/msg00435.html (9,980 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]