Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*WARNING\!\s+SPITFIRE\s+VIRUS\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*WARNING\!\s+SPITFIRE\s+VIRUS\s*$/: 30 ]

Total 30 documents matching your query.

1. WARNING! SPITFIRE VIRUS (score: 1): Author: Reed Mideke <rmideke@interbase.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 12:29:41 -0700; THIS IS NOT A HOAX. It has been confirmed by independent authorities such as the DOT, DEA and SCCA. I also learned first hand how dangerous it can be. WHAT IT IS: If you find in your possession and; /html/spitfires/1999-04/msg00359.html (8,038 bytes)
2. Re: WARNING! SPITFIRE VIRUS (score: 1): Author: "Neil McAllister" <neil.mcallister@fvrl.bc.ca>; Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 19:45:49 GMT; Reed is right!! But, he also failed to mention that the virus will drain your bank account and lead you to make questionable claims regarding the reliability of English Automotive Profucts. BEWARE!!; /html/spitfires/1999-04/msg00361.html (8,942 bytes)
3. Re: WARNING! SPITFIRE VIRUS (score: 1): Author: "Michael Thomas" <mathomas@engmail.uwaterloo.ca>; Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 16:00:36 -0400; I also have the Spitfire Virus, with additional symptoms of oil stains on the driveway and a lot of grease-stained clothing... Mike Cambridge, Ontario; /html/spitfires/1999-04/msg00362.html (7,744 bytes)
4. RE: WARNING! SPITFIRE VIRUS (score: 1): Author: Craig Smith <CraigS@iewc.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 15:16:55 -0500; It will also infect your garage. Causes the non-use of half of the total. Spotting on concrete another by product is a fine dust of old paint being over everything ! It could result in running off th; /html/spitfires/1999-04/msg00363.html (9,621 bytes)
5. Re: WARNING! SPITFIRE VIRUS (score: 1): Author: "Earl Smith" <earl56@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 20:34:54 GMT; I can vouch for the danger of this virus.It also acts very quickly and is addictive Earl 75,76,&79 Spit"viruses"fires MHotMailB8DF8B890138D101707D9B63BC340D390; Thu Apr 15 12:39:57 1999 (8.9.1/8.9.1); /html/spitfires/1999-04/msg00364.html (10,136 bytes)
6. RE: WARNING! SPITFIRE VIRUS (score: 1): Author: "Simmons, Reid W" <reid.w.simmons@intel.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 14:15:44 -0700; Yeah, and it's kind of like Malaria - no permanent cure. Even if the original cause is eliminated the effects on the mind and body last forever. Reid '79 Spitfire I can vouch for the danger of this v; /html/spitfires/1999-04/msg00365.html (10,720 bytes)
7. Re: WARNING! SPITFIRE VIRUS (score: 1): Author: "Brad Kahler" <brad.kahler@141.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 18:02:05 -0500; The worst part is when it mutates into other forms, such as the TR4 virus or the TR3 virus. Each time it mutates it seems to cost more to try and irradicate it! Brad (Lincoln Nebraska 402-464-1502) M; /html/spitfires/1999-04/msg00366.html (11,266 bytes)
8. Re: WARNING! SPITFIRE VIRUS (score: 1): Author: "Patrick D. Baize" <ArtVanGo@swbell.net>; Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 18:20:33 -0500; Mines Broke, but can you beleive I'm trying to fix it? Pat '63 partial; /html/spitfires/1999-04/msg00367.html (9,137 bytes)
9. Re: WARNING! SPITFIRE VIRUS (score: 1): Author: Metallian6@aol.com; Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 00:43:56 EDT; The '79 Spitfires are more infected than all the other Spitfires. If you should happen to see one step back and run away. Then call me. Hehehehehe I'll take it home for further study. ;-) James Still; /html/spitfires/1999-04/msg00373.html (8,316 bytes)
10. Re: WARNING! SPITFIRE VIRUS (score: 1): Author: "Laura G." <savercool@email.msn.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 22:22:22 -0700; I find that the '77 Spits are infectious! Those and the MK1! (The first spitty I ever saw!-that's where i picked up the virus) <BG> Laura G. and Nigel; /html/spitfires/1999-04/msg00374.html (8,791 bytes)
11. Re: WARNING! SPITFIRE VIRUS (score: 1): Author: John Suchak <suchak@mediaone.net>; Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 08:43:00 -0400; Hey James: I'm building a '74 Spit, I'm curious why you like the '79's specifically.. Most people I've met tend to prefer the earlier cars in the squaretail series because of the steel bumpers and la; /html/spitfires/1999-04/msg00376.html (9,159 bytes)
12. Re: WARNING! SPITFIRE VIRUS (score: 1): Author: Mike.Hopkins@mis.magna-europa.com; Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 14:13:16 +0100; Er...John how about a 1500 engine and the posibility of 100mph now thats a virus with a mission. John Suchak <suchak@mediaone.net> on 16/04/99 13:43:00 Please respond to John Suchak <suchak@mediaone.; /html/spitfires/1999-04/msg00377.html (10,281 bytes)
13. Re[2]: WARNING! SPITFIRE VIRUS (score: 1): Author: Sebastian_King@ipc.co.uk; Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 14:31:57 +0100; MKIII - definately the best looking http://www.sebking.demon.co.uk/triumph.htm Hey James: I'm building a '74 Spit, I'm curious why you like the '79's specifically.. Most people I've met tend to prefe; /html/spitfires/1999-04/msg00379.html (9,573 bytes)
14. Re: WARNING! SPITFIRE VIRUS (score: 1): Author: John Suchak <suchak@mediaone.net>; Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 10:55:46 -0400; Hey Mike: The 1500 motor was in all of the 1500 series cars, including the pre-smog cars, so that can't be the reason to prefer the '79. Besides, a lot of people will tell you that the 1300 is the wa; /html/spitfires/1999-04/msg00382.html (10,512 bytes)
15. Re: WARNING! SPITFIRE VIRUS (score: 1): Author: John Suchak <suchak@mediaone.net>; Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 11:06:48 -0400; Hmmmmmm... I'll give you the nod on the tail-lights, but I'm still an avowed 1500 guy myself: (see for yourself...) http://www.jacksonville.net/~suchak/toys.htm JS (PS, *damn* nice job on that Mk3, b; /html/spitfires/1999-04/msg00384.html (10,267 bytes)
16. RE: WARNING! SPITFIRE VIRUS (score: 1): Author: "Childs, David" <dchilds@epri.com>; Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 11:13:13 -0400; What year did they go to the 5 inch rim? Rust proofing may be better as Dave C 79 Spit 6 (dumping the rubber bumpers!) Hey Mike: The 1500 motor was in all of the 1500 series cars, including the pre-s; /html/spitfires/1999-04/msg00385.html (11,043 bytes)
17. RE: WARNING! SPITFIRE VIRUS (score: 1): Author: "Sizemore, Shane" <shane.sizemore@medaphis.com>; Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 11:19:47 -0400; I for one like the steering columns, 1/2 wider wheels, blacked out door handle surrounds/wiper arms, electric fan AND the bumpers...on the 79/80's. (once smog stuff is removed too).. back ME up here; /html/spitfires/1999-04/msg00386.html (12,242 bytes)
18. RE: WARNING! SPITFIRE VIRUS (score: 1): Author: "Sizemore, Shane" <shane.sizemore@medaphis.com>; Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 11:45:34 -0400; 1979-1980 had the 13x5 wheels.... What year did they go to the 5 inch rim? Rust proofing may be better as well. Dave C 79 Spit 6 (dumping the rubber bumpers!) Hey Mike: The 1500 motor was in all of t; /html/spitfires/1999-04/msg00389.html (12,349 bytes)
19. RE: WARNING! SPITFIRE VIRUS (score: 1): Author: jak0pab@jak10.med.navy.mil (Bowen, Patrick A. RP2); Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 12:05:20; OOps little late joining this conversation (was busy in Atlanta buying another '79 1500 from Shane Sizemore) The black bumpers look nice if they are done right, if they haven't been touched in 20 yea; /html/spitfires/1999-04/msg00393.html (13,208 bytes)
20. Re: WARNING! SPITFIRE VIRUS (score: 1): Author: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>; Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 09:07:31 -0700; I disagree, but only because the front bumper is set too high! 8^) Joe (2 Mk1's) -- "If you can't excel with talent, triumph with effort." -- Dave Weinbaum in National Enquirer; /html/spitfires/1999-04/msg00396.html (8,795 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]