autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Autocross Timing/Scoring Software

To: "Clay Horste" <clay@metashock.com>, "Paul Foster" <pfoster@gdi.net>,
Subject: Re: Autocross Timing/Scoring Software
From: "Steve Ashcraft" <ashcraft2@home.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 16:43:14 -0400
YES---And who cares if the timing equipment is 50% off if it is 50% off for
all of the competitors and is always about 50% off for all of the events.
The only interesting comparisons between drivers are usually based on a
percentage and not a raw number of milliseconds.

----- Original Message -----
From: Clay Horste <clay@metashock.com>
To: Paul Foster <pfoster@gdi.net>; team.net <autox@autox.team.net>;
<dennis@raceamerica.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 1999 12:07 PM
Subject: Re: Autocross Timing/Scoring Software


> Wouldn't environmental variables such as elevation, surface, humidity etc.
> give more accuracy error from event to event than the hardware or OS.  I
> would think that as long as precise within the same event.  I just wonder
if
> we are nitpicking the wrong things here.
>
> -clay-
>
>
>
> > All of the software timing solutions are cost effective (if you don't
> > count
> > the cost of the PC) and offer the driver registration and scoring, some
> > offer the timing also.  Software timing will vary slightly from one PC
> > to
> > another based on what's in the PC, so comparing results from one region
> > to
> > another would not be accurate to .001 seconds.  Comparing results from
> > one
> > event to another would require using the same PC hardware for both
> > events,
> > but even then, that would not guarantee .001 second accuracy for both
> > events.>>>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>