autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [evolution-disc.] Update Question

To: rocky@tri.net, mark@sccaprepared.com,
Subject: Re: [evolution-disc.] Update Question
From: Smokerbros@aol.com
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 23:25:54 EST
In a message dated 3/26/04 7:01:52 PM Pacific Standard Time, rocky@tri.net 
writes:


> Wouldn't "doing enough work that it is indistinguishable from..." have to
> include changing the VIN plate to make it truly indistinguishable?
> 
> But then, isn't changing the VIN plate illegal? Fraudulent?
> 
> Seems like Catch 22, affirming the rule Alan quoted.
> 
I agree with Rocky.  Though I can see a situation where you are replacing 
significant numbers of parts, possibly all at the same time, possibly at 
different times, and end up with a vehicle which has very few parts that were 
on the 
original car.  As long as the VIN says it's a 2004, and it has all the right 
parts to be a 2004, how would a PC determine that it's made from parts of cars 
that were not 2004's?

A different situation than the original question, though...  I doubt the 
owner of a 2002 will want to go find 2004 parts with VINs on them to justify 
his 
2004 CF hood...

Charlie






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>