autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [evolution-disc.] Re: Complaint about STU ProSolo index

To: "Eric Linnhoff" <knuckledragger@kcweb.net>
Subject: Re: [evolution-disc.] Re: Complaint about STU ProSolo index
From: "Chuck" <golden1@britsys.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 14:04:52 -0500
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric Linnhoff" <knuckledragger@kcweb.net>
Cc: "'Evolution'" <evolution-discussions@yahoogroups.com>; "'autox mailing
list'" <autox@autox.team.net>
Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2005 12:45 PM
Subject: RE: [evolution-disc.] Re: Complaint about STU ProSolo index


> -----Original Message-----
> Whether or not Pro Solo _should_ be run by the SEB is obviously a subject
> that can be debated.  I would suggest that if you think Pro Solo should
fall
> under the SEB then you should write your BoD rep asking for that change.
It
> is the BoD that make such decisions.

IMHO it should NOT be run at the sole whim of one individual who can and
does change the rules at the flip of a ponytail who seems to consider it a
pain in the posterior and has no incentive or accountability to run a
quality program. This isn't NASCAR.






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>