It's probably a little more work, but maybe it'd be an incentive to have
the "Hall of Shame" list of all the DNWs pulled out at the top of the
results, both on the web and the printed ones. Right now, you only see the
DNWs in your class. Of course, since you're running with the DNWs, maybe
it's better to see the ones in your class - then you can give them that
"reminder" to work that they so rightly deserve...
Jim
At 01:54 PM 11/1/2001 -0800, Pat Kelly wrote:
> When this whole deal started, we simply gave no points or finishing
>position with a "DNW" by the name. For some it took a few of these before it
>sank in. I can thing of some very well known drivers where it took 5 DNWs!
> Asking registraion to maintain a list to keep the bad apples out is not
>a good idea, as the folks who run change during run groups.
> Lately we've not been showing times, too (which we used to do, just so's
>the offender would know where they could have finished had he/she worked.
>But we've drawn a harder line at present.
> Usually the offenders get the picture pretty quickly and do one of two
>things: 1) don't return; or 2) return and work. Either is okay with me.
> Another offense some do is to get their names checked off, and wander
>away. So you really have to be a cop to keep them going in the right
>direction. :)
>--Pat K
>----------
> >From: Jesus Villarreal <jesvilla@gte.net>
> >To: Cheryl Grantz <sgrantz@peoplepc.com>
> >Cc: ba autocross list <ba-autox@autox.team.net>
> >Subject: Re: More DNWs
> >Date: Thu, Nov 1, 2001, 1:45 PM
> >
>
> >Cheryl Grantz wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> So every worker sheet was compared to the results to see if the lack of
> >> workers was due to some people not even signing up to work.
> >>
> >> Sherry
> >
> >People caught doing this should be penalized somehow. Maybe confiscating
> >their SCCA membership card at the next event they attend(we might not be
> >able to do that) or banning them for a year. I had a few doing this at
> >AAS events, it only took one warning of being banned for a year and they
> >didn't do it again. At least I haven't caught anyone doing it lately. If
> >they get mad and don't come back, so what, SCCA doesn't need bad apples.
> >Most good people will respond positively to a firm warning.
> >
> >Jesus
|