Actually, there are some cars running in AP with smaller engines, probably
only one, a Lotus Elan driven by a father and son team from San Diego. I
guess they'd go to D Mod?
--Pat Kelly
----------
>From: "James Creasy" <james@thevenom.net>
>To: "Pat Kelly" <lollipop487@comcast.net>, <Smokerbros@aol.com>,
<ba-autox@autox.team.net>
>Subject: Re: FFR wendover report
>Date: Tue, Jul 22, 2003, 8:34 PM
>
> i think it would be competitive in E Mod also, judging from david's times
> vs. the austin healey.
>
> as john pointed out, there doesnt seem to be much difference in prep level
> between AP and E Mod.
>
> james
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Pat Kelly" <lollipop487@comcast.net>
> To: <Smokerbros@aol.com>; <ba-autox@autox.team.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 8:02 PM
> Subject: Re: FFR wendover report
>
>
>> I guess those cars can run in E Mod??? :0
>> --Pat Kelly
>>
>> ----------
>> >From: Smokerbros@aol.com
>> >To: ba-autox@autox.team.net
>> >Subject: Re: FFR wendover report
>> >Date: Tue, Jul 22, 2003, 7:55 PM
>> >
>>
>> > In a message dated 7/22/03 2:05:29 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
>> > james@thevenom.net writes:
>> >
>> >
>> >> It was interesting to hear from a number of the Prepared class veterans
>> >> that
>> >> they think the FFR Cobra may be the perfect car for A prepared! One
> former
>> >> national champion said that cars like the Borden's IS the future of A
>> >> Prepared. So it's not too hard to image that an FFR might do VERY well
> at
>> >> nationals this years, and if it does it sounds like the SCCA would love
> to
>> >> see more of them show up! This will be interesting!
>> >
>> > Then they'd better bring a BUNCH of FFR's to the 2003 Nationals!
> A/Prepared
>> > is on the chopping block! It's about to not be a class at all, due to
> not
>> > meeting the sunset rule (4.7, page 57 in your rule book). It appears
> that the
>> > first time this could be implemented would be 2005. If there is
> sufficient
>> > participation in '03, the SEB might be convinced to make the deletion of
> AP
>> > "tentative" for '05, dependent on '04 participation. Otherwise the FFR
>> > might be the
>> > future of a class that HAS no future!
>> >
>> > Charlie
|