[Top] [All Lists]

RE: what about a single 1.5 su?

To: "'RevdSpridget@aol.com'" <RevdSpridget@aol.com>, esheffield@megapipe.net, androbus@yahoo.com
Subject: RE: what about a single 1.5 su?
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 15:42:02 -0500
Cc: midgetsprite@yahoogroups.com, spridgets@autox.team.net
Actually, Vizard says its quite the opposite, that the movement of air
through the single carb sort of sets up a "mini ram" effect from cylinder to
cylinder that twin carbs don't have because the air isn't moving as fast or
as often.  I don't know, but it makes good reading!


-----Original Message-----
From RevdSpridget at aol.com [mailto:RevdSpridget@aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 2:59 PM
To: esheffield@megapipe.net; androbus@yahoo.com
Cc: midgetsprite@yahoogroups.com; spridgets@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: what about a single 1.5 su?

Although no-one says so, I would expect that at higher rpm the advantage 
swings back towards twin carbs because the ports are 'seeing' the big single

so often it has hasn't seen one port before it starts to see another.  What 
that rpm is I can't guess at but bet it is higher for a 998 than a 1275, 
1380, etc.


///  unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net  or try
///  http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/spridgets

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>