triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Looking for TR6 Performance Info

To: msecrest@erols.com
Subject: Re: Looking for TR6 Performance Info
From: "Donald H. Locker" <dhl@chelseamsl.com>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 10:29:23 -0400
Cc: Stephen.Hill@gems7.gov.bc.ca, triumphs@autox.team.net
References: <61779D992E61D311B42D0008C7E63974030033B0@candle.gov.bc.ca> <3923DBDE.107130EF@erols.com>
Roller rockers [at least the ones I have seen] also have a roller at
the valve tip, sincerely reducing side loads on the valve stem,
extending guide and stem life, as well as the tip and rocker.  Not to
mention the life improvement from running antifriction bearings on the
rocker shaft.  Make sure there is sufficient lube getting up there,
though.

Donald.

> Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 08:02:38 -0400
> From: "Martin A. Secrest" <msecrest@erols.com>
> 
> Stephen:
> 
> While you're at it, would you come over to my garage and rebuild my engine 
>too?
> I like the sound of what you're doing.
> 
> As per the rollers, I don't know -- perchance with the extra lift from your 
>new
> cam, and the higher revs you'll be turning, they could be justifiable.  But it
> seems to me the slightly less resistance your pushrods will encounter against
> the roller rockers ain't going to amount to any HP you'll notice, though it
> would be nice piece of mind to have them.  I'd be interested to hear what some
> of the other listers have to say on this ...
> 
> --
> Martin Secrest
> 72 TR6
> 73 GT6
> 
> "Hill, Stephen M EDUC:EX" wrote:
> 
> > I am planning on building a relatively radical engine, hoping to get to 175
> > plus horsepower. I have triple webers, plans on a fast road cam, shooting
> > for 9.75:1 compression, lightened flywheel,etc. I think it is possible to
> > build this much power and still have it streetable and reliable. I recognize
> > the rollers won't do a lot for power (maybe 3hp), but I am wondering if I
> > will get more life out of the cam, lifters, and guides. Or is it just

[SNIP]

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>